The Federal Bulletin Board Online via GPO AccessThe Federal Bulletin Board Online via GPO Access
The Federal Bulletin Board (FBB) is a free electronic bulletin board service of the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office (GPO). All file library documents can be downloaded for free.
r009.pdf 10/12/00 9519 bytes (146 hits)
FIORE v. WHITE, WARDEN, ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
No. 98-942.
Argued October 12, 1999
Decided November 30, 1999
Syllabus
r009o.pdf 10/12/00 590412 bytes (39 hits)
FIORE v. WHITE, WARDEN, ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
No. 98-942.
Argued October 12, 1999
Decided November 30, 1999
Opinion
00a145za.pdf 10/10/00 8990 bytes (93 hits)
Amendment to order 00-A145
UNITED STATES v. OAKLAND CANNABIS BUYERS’
COOPERATIVE ET AL. ON APPLICATION FOR STAY
August 29, 2000
84origze.pdf 06/29/00 571108 bytes (222 hits)
Decree
981648zc.pdf 06/28/00 87422 bytes (402 hits)
MITCHELL ET AL. v. HELMS ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-1648.
Argued December 1, 1999
Decided June 28, 2000
Concurrence
981648zd.pdf 06/28/00 172174 bytes (129 hits)
MITCHELL ET AL. v. HELMS ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-1648.
Argued December 1, 1999
Decided June 28, 2000
Dissent
981648zo.pdf 06/28/00 137481 bytes (176 hits)
MITCHELL ET AL. v. HELMS ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-1648.
Argued December 1, 1999
Decided June 28, 2000
Opinion
981648zs.pdf 06/28/00 36201 bytes (226 hits)
MITCHELL ET AL. v. HELMS ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-1648.
Argued December 1, 1999
Decided June 28, 2000
Syllabus
981856d1.pdf 06/28/00 79833 bytes (157 hits)
HILL ET AL. v. COLORADO ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO
No. 98-1856.
Argued January 19, 2000
Decided June 28, 2000
Another Dissent
981856zc.pdf 06/28/00 25579 bytes (93 hits)
HILL ET AL. v. COLORADO ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO
No. 98-1856.
Argued January 19, 2000
Decided June 28, 2000
Concurrence
981856zd.pdf 06/28/00 91241 bytes (82 hits)
HILL ET AL. v. COLORADO ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO
No. 98-1856.
Argued January 19, 2000
Decided June 28, 2000
Dissent
981856zo.pdf 06/28/00 102716 bytes (133 hits)
HILL ET AL. v. COLORADO ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO
No. 98-1856.
Argued January 19, 2000
Decided June 28, 2000
Opinion
981856zs.pdf 06/28/00 17737 bytes (148 hits)
HILL ET AL. v. COLORADO ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO
No. 98-1856.
Argued January 19, 2000
Decided June 28, 2000
Syllabus
99-699d1.pdf 06/28/00 12052 bytes (688 hits)
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ET AL. v. DALE
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY
No. 99-699.
Argued April 26, 2000
Decided June 28, 2000
Another Dissent
99-699zd.pdf 06/28/00 136097 bytes (415 hits)
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ET AL. v. DALE
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY
No. 99-699.
Argued April 26, 2000
Decided June 28, 2000
Dissent
99-699zo.pdf 06/28/00 53429 bytes (667 hits)
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ET AL. v. DALE
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY
No. 99-699.
Argued April 26, 2000
Decided June 28, 2000
Opinion
99-699zs.pdf 06/28/00 15992 bytes (486 hits)
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ET AL. v. DALE
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY
No. 99-699.
Argued April 26, 2000
Decided June 28, 2000
Syllabus
99-830zc.pdf 06/28/00 9001 bytes (367 hits)
STENBERG, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEBRASKA,
ET AL. v. CARHART
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-830.
Argued April 25, 2000
Decided June 28, 2000
Concurrence
99-830zd.pdf 06/28/00 6594 bytes (370 hits)
STENBERG, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEBRASKA,
ET AL. v. CARHART
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-830.
Argued April 25, 2000
Decided June 28, 2000
Dissent
99-830zo.pdf 06/28/00 90386 bytes (298 hits)
STENBERG, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEBRASKA,
ET AL. v. CARHART
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-830.
Argued April 25, 2000
Decided June 28, 2000
Opinion
99-830zs.pdf 06/28/00 21874 bytes (267 hits)
STENBERG, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEBRASKA,
ET AL. v. CARHART
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-830.
Argued April 25, 2000
Decided June 28, 2000
Syllabus
99830zc1.pdf 06/28/00 17430 bytes (146 hits)
STENBERG, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEBRASKA,
ET AL. v. CARHART
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-830.
Argued April 25, 2000
Decided June 28, 2000
Another Concurrence
99830zc2.pdf 06/28/00 9130 bytes (137 hits)
STENBERG, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEBRASKA,
ET AL. v. CARHART
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-830.
Argued April 25, 2000
Decided June 28, 2000
Still Another Concurrence
99830zd1.pdf 06/28/00 16140 bytes (308 hits)
STENBERG, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEBRASKA,
ET AL. v. CARHART
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-830.
Argued April 25, 2000
Decided June 28, 2000
Another Dissent
99830zd2.pdf 06/28/00 82787 bytes (186 hits)
STENBERG, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEBRASKA,
ET AL. v. CARHART
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-830.
Argued April 25, 2000
Decided June 28, 2000
Still Another Dissent
99830zd3.pdf 06/28/00 123778 bytes (195 hits)
STENBERG, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEBRASKA,
ET AL. v. CARHART
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-830.
Argued April 25, 2000
Decided June 28, 2000
Yet Still Another Dissent
99244zd.pdf 06/26/00 44922 bytes (128 hits)
MOBIL OIL EXPLORATION & PRODUCING
SOUTHEAST, INC. v. UNITED STATES
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT
No. 99-244.
Argued March 22, 2000
Decided June 26, 2000*
Dissent
* Together with No. 99-253, Marathon Oil Co. v.
United States, also on certiorari to the same
court.
99244zo.pdf 06/26/00 47330 bytes (94 hits)
MOBIL OIL EXPLORATION & PRODUCING
SOUTHEAST, INC. v. UNITED STATES
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT
No. 99-244.
Argued March 22, 2000
Decided June 26, 2000*
Opinion
* Together with No. 99-253, Marathon Oil Co. v.
United States, also on certiorari to the same
court.
99244zs.pdf 06/26/00 15001 bytes (68 hits)
MOBIL OIL EXPLORATION & PRODUCING
SOUTHEAST, INC. v. UNITED STATES
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT
No. 99-244.
Argued March 22, 2000
Decided June 26, 2000*
Syllabus
* Together with No. 99-253, Marathon Oil Co. v.
United States, also on certiorari to the same
court.
99401zc.pdf 06/26/00 15096 bytes (161 hits)
CALIFORNIA DEMOCRATIC PARTY ET AL. v. JONES,
SECRETARY OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-401.
Argued April 24, 2000
Decided June 26, 2000
Concurrence
99401zd.pdf 06/26/00 44846 bytes (84 hits)
CALIFORNIA DEMOCRATIC PARTY ET AL. v. JONES,
SECRETARY OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-401.
Argued April 24, 2000
Decided June 26, 2000
Dissent
99401zo.pdf 06/26/00 52666 bytes (108 hits)
CALIFORNIA DEMOCRATIC PARTY ET AL. v. JONES,
SECRETARY OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-401.
Argued April 24, 2000
Decided June 26, 2000
Opinion
99401zs.pdf 06/26/00 12974 bytes (104 hits)
CALIFORNIA DEMOCRATIC PARTY ET AL. v. JONES,
SECRETARY OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-401.
Argued April 24, 2000
Decided June 26, 2000
Syllabus
99478zc.pdf 06/26/00 8986 bytes (245 hits)
APPRENDI v. NEW JERSEY
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY
No. 99-478.
Argued March 28, 2000
Decided June 26, 2000
Concurrence
99478zd.pdf 06/26/00 87192 bytes (104 hits)
APPRENDI v. NEW JERSEY
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY
No. 99-478.
Argued March 28, 2000
Decided June 26, 2000
Dissent
99478zo.pdf 06/26/00 91417 bytes (189 hits)
APPRENDI v. NEW JERSEY
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY
No. 99-478.
Argued March 28, 2000
Decided June 26, 2000
Opinion
99478zs.pdf 06/26/00 12261 bytes (199 hits)
APPRENDI v. NEW JERSEY
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY
No. 99-478.
Argued March 28, 2000
Decided June 26, 2000
Syllabus
995525zd.pdf 06/26/00 65431 bytes (424 hits)
DICKERSON v. UNITED STATES
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-5525.
Argued April 19, 2000
Decided June 26, 2000
Dissent
995525zo.pdf 06/26/00 45061 bytes (525 hits)
DICKERSON v. UNITED STATES
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-5525.
Argued April 19, 2000
Decided June 26, 2000
Opinion
995525zs.pdf 06/26/00 16654 bytes (317 hits)
DICKERSON v. UNITED STATES
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-5525.
Argued April 19, 2000
Decided June 26, 2000
Syllabus
8origzo.pdf 06/19/00 65988 bytes (158 hits)
ARIZONA v. CALIFORNIA
ON EXCEPTIONS TO REPORT OF SPECIAL MASTER
No. 8, Orig.
Argued April 25, 2000
Decided June 19, 2000
Opinion
8origzs.pdf 06/19/00 22968 bytes (84 hits)
ARIZONA v. CALIFORNIA
ON EXCEPTIONS TO REPORT OF SPECIAL MASTER
No. 8, Orig.
Argued April 25, 2000
Decided June 19, 2000
Syllabus
8origzx.pdf 06/19/00 20292 bytes (47 hits)
ARIZONA v. CALIFORNIA
ON EXCEPTIONS TO REPORT OF SPECIAL MASTER
No. 8, Orig.
Argued April 25, 2000
Decided June 19, 2000
Concurrence/Dissent
99-224zd.pdf 06/19/00 28467 bytes (106 hits)
MILLER, SUPERINTENDENT, PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL
FACILITY, ET AL. v. FRENCH ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-224.
Argued April 18, 2000
Decided June 19, 2000*
Dissent
* Together with No. 99-582, United States v.
French et al., also on certiorari to the same
court.
99-224zo.pdf 06/19/00 56352 bytes (51 hits)
MILLER, SUPERINTENDENT, PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL
FACILITY, ET AL. v. FRENCH ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-224.
Argued April 18, 2000
Decided June 19, 2000*
Opinion
* Together with No. 99-582, United States v.
French et al., also on certiorari to the same
court.
99-224zs.pdf 06/19/00 17490 bytes (62 hits)
MILLER, SUPERINTENDENT, PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL
FACILITY, ET AL. v. FRENCH ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-224.
Argued April 18, 2000
Decided June 19, 2000*
Syllabus
* Together with No. 99-582, United States v.
French et al., also on certiorari to the same
court.
99-224zx.pdf 06/19/00 13442 bytes (31 hits)
MILLER, SUPERINTENDENT, PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL
FACILITY, ET AL. v. FRENCH ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-224.
Argued April 18, 2000
Decided June 19, 2000*
Concurrence/Dissent
* Together with No. 99-582, United States v.
French et al., also on certiorari to the same
court.
99-474zc.pdf 06/19/00 16407 bytes (115 hits)
CROSBY, SECRETARY OF ADMINISTRATION AND
FINANCE OF MASSACHUSETTS, ET AL. v. NATIONAL
FOREIGN TRADE COUNCIL
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
No. 99-474.
Argued March 22, 2000
Decided June 19, 2000
Concurrence
99-474zo.pdf 06/19/00 67376 bytes (76 hits)
CROSBY, SECRETARY OF ADMINISTRATION AND
FINANCE OF MASSACHUSETTS, ET AL. v. NATIONAL
FOREIGN TRADE COUNCIL
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
No. 99-474.
Argued March 22, 2000
Decided June 19, 2000
Opinion
99-474zs.pdf 06/19/00 12111 bytes (92 hits)
CROSBY, SECRETARY OF ADMINISTRATION AND
FINANCE OF MASSACHUSETTS, ET AL. v. NATIONAL
FOREIGN TRADE COUNCIL
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
No. 99-474.
Argued March 22, 2000
Decided June 19, 2000
Syllabus
99-62zd.pdf 06/19/00 29303 bytes (639 hits)
SANTA FE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT v.
DOE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND FOR
HER MINOR CHILDREN, ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-62.
Argued March 29, 2000
Decided June 19, 2000
Dissent
99-62zo.pdf 06/19/00 69428 bytes (461 hits)
SANTA FE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT v.
DOE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND FOR
HER MINOR CHILDREN, ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-62.
Argued March 29, 2000
Decided June 19, 2000
Opinion
99-62zs.pdf 06/19/00 18365 bytes (357 hits)
SANTA FE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT v.
DOE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND FOR
HER MINOR CHILDREN, ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-62.
Argued March 29, 2000
Decided June 19, 2000
Syllabus
991625zd.pdf 06/19/00 19540 bytes (169 hits)
TANGIPAHOA PARISH BOARD OF EDUCATION ET AL.
v. HERB FREILER ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED
STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-1625.
Decided June 19, 2000
Dissent
981949zo.pdf 06/12/00 63295 bytes (319 hits)
PEGRAM ET AL. v. HERDRICH
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-1949.
Argued February 23, 2000
Decided June 12, 2000
Opinion
981949zs.pdf 06/12/00 15897 bytes (179 hits)
PEGRAM ET AL. v. HERDRICH
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-1949.
Argued February 23, 2000
Decided June 12, 2000
Syllabus
99-536zc.pdf 06/12/00 8504 bytes (401 hits)
REEVES v. SANDERSON PLUMBING PRODUCTS, INC.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-536.
Argued March 21, 2000
Decided June 12, 2000
Concurrence
99-536zo.pdf 06/12/00 65919 bytes (284 hits)
REEVES v. SANDERSON PLUMBING PRODUCTS, INC.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-536.
Argued March 21, 2000
Decided June 12, 2000
Opinion
99-536zs.pdf 06/12/00 18490 bytes (251 hits)
REEVES v. SANDERSON PLUMBING PRODUCTS, INC.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-536.
Argued March 21, 2000
Decided June 12, 2000
Syllabus
99-579zo.pdf 06/12/00 41316 bytes (100 hits)
HARRIS TRUST AND SAVINGS BANK, AS TRUSTEE
FOR THE AMERITECH PENSION TRUST, ET AL. v.
SALOMON SMITH BARNEY INC. ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-579.
Argued April 17, 2000
Decided June 12, 2000
Opinion
99-579zs.pdf 06/12/00 18227 bytes (69 hits)
HARRIS TRUST AND SAVINGS BANK, AS TRUSTEE
FOR THE AMERITECH PENSION TRUST, ET AL. v.
SALOMON SMITH BARNEY INC. ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-579.
Argued April 17, 2000
Decided June 12, 2000
Syllabus
995716zd.pdf 06/12/00 44324 bytes (90 hits)
CARTER v. UNITED STATES
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
No. 99-5716.
Argued April 19, 2000
Decided June 12, 2000
Dissent
995716zo.pdf 06/12/00 49242 bytes (62 hits)
CARTER v. UNITED STATES
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
No. 99-5716.
Argued April 19, 2000
Decided June 12, 2000
Opinion
995716zs.pdf 06/12/00 17084 bytes (77 hits)
CARTER v. UNITED STATES
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
No. 99-5716.
Argued April 19, 2000
Decided June 12, 2000
Syllabus
997000zc.pdf 06/12/00 17006 bytes (41 hits)
RAMDASS v. ANGELONE, DIRECTOR, VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-7000.
Argued April 18, 2000
Decided June 12, 2000
Concurrence
997000zd.pdf 06/12/00 89778 bytes (26 hits)
RAMDASS v. ANGELONE, DIRECTOR, VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-7000.
Argued April 18, 2000
Decided June 12, 2000
Dissent
997000zo.pdf 06/12/00 55637 bytes (39 hits)
RAMDASS v. ANGELONE, DIRECTOR, VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-7000.
Argued April 18, 2000
Decided June 12, 2000
Opinion
997000zs.pdf 06/12/00 14254 bytes (61 hits)
RAMDASS v. ANGELONE, DIRECTOR, VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-7000.
Argued April 18, 2000
Decided June 12, 2000
Syllabus
981682c1.pdf 06/06/00 11878 bytes (158 hits)
UNITED STATES ET AL. v. PLAYBOY ENTERTAINMENT
GROUP, INC.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
No. 98-1682.
Argued November 30, 1999
Decided May 22, 2000
Another Concurrence
981682d1.pdf 06/06/00 39886 bytes (41 hits)
UNITED STATES ET AL. v. PLAYBOY ENTERTAINMENT
GROUP, INC.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
No. 98-1682.
Argued November 30, 1999
Decided May 22, 2000
Another Dissent
981682zc.pdf 06/06/00 8360 bytes (25 hits)
UNITED STATES ET AL. v. PLAYBOY ENTERTAINMENT
GROUP, INC.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
No. 98-1682.
Argued November 30, 1999
Decided May 22, 2000
Concurrence
981682zd.pdf 06/06/00 19155 bytes (35 hits)
UNITED STATES ET AL. v. PLAYBOY ENTERTAINMENT
GROUP, INC.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
No. 98-1682.
Argued November 30, 1999
Decided May 22, 2000
Dissent
981682zo.pdf 06/06/00 62435 bytes (71 hits)
UNITED STATES ET AL. v. PLAYBOY ENTERTAINMENT
GROUP, INC.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
No. 98-1682.
Argued November 30, 1999
Decided May 22, 2000
Opinion
981682zs.pdf 06/06/00 15583 bytes (87 hits)
UNITED STATES ET AL. v. PLAYBOY ENTERTAINMENT
GROUP, INC.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
No. 98-1682.
Argued November 30, 1999
Decided May 22, 2000
Syllabus
981811ZD.PDF 06/06/00 81087 bytes (30 hits)
GEIER ET AL. v. AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC.,
ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
No. 98-1811.
Argued December 7, 1999
Decided May 22, 2000
Dissent
981811zo.pdf 06/06/00 81087 bytes (33 hits)
GEIER ET AL. v. AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC.,
ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
No. 98-1811.
Argued December 7, 1999
Decided May 22, 2000
Opinion
981811zs.pdf 06/06/00 15140 bytes (50 hits)
GEIER ET AL. v. AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC.,
ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
No. 98-1811.
Argued December 7, 1999
Decided May 22, 2000
Syllabus
981828c1.pdf 06/06/00 9070 bytes (23 hits)
VERMONT AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES v.
UNITED STATES EX REL. STEVENS
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
No. 98-1828.
Argued November 29, 1999
Decided May 22, 2000
Another Concurrence
981828zc.pdf 06/06/00 5910 bytes (10 hits)
VERMONT AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES v.
UNITED STATES EX REL. STEVENS
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
No. 98-1828.
Argued November 29, 1999
Decided May 22, 2000
Concurrence
981828zd.pdf 06/06/00 45131 bytes (12 hits)
VERMONT AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES v.
UNITED STATES EX REL. STEVENS
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
No. 98-1828.
Argued November 29, 1999
Decided May 22, 2000
Dissent
981828zo.pdf 06/06/00 64722 bytes (19 hits)
VERMONT AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES v.
UNITED STATES EX REL. STEVENS
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
No. 98-1828.
Argued November 29, 1999
Decided May 22, 2000
Opinion
981828zs.pdf 06/06/00 11311 bytes (23 hits)
VERMONT AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES v.
UNITED STATES EX REL. STEVENS
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
No. 98-1828.
Argued November 29, 1999
Decided May 22, 2000
Syllabus
989828zd.pdf 06/06/00 21242 bytes (43 hits)
OHLER v. UNITED STATES
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-9828.
Argued March 20, 2000
Decided May 22, 2000
Dissent
989828zo.pdf 06/06/00 25017 bytes (31 hits)
OHLER v. UNITED STATES
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-9828.
Argued March 20, 2000
Decided May 22, 2000
Opinion
989828zs.pdf 06/06/00 10188 bytes (43 hits)
OHLER v. UNITED STATES
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-9828.
Argued March 20, 2000
Decided May 22, 2000
Syllabus
995739c1.pdf 06/06/00 6147 bytes (39 hits)
JONES v. UNITED STATES
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-5739.
Argued March 21, 2000
Decided May 22, 2000
Another Concurrence
995739zc.pdf 06/06/00 9783 bytes (16 hits)
JONES v. UNITED STATES
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-5739.
Argued March 21, 2000
Decided May 22, 2000
Concurrence
995739zo.pdf 06/06/00 31224 bytes (52 hits)
JONES v. UNITED STATES
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-5739.
Argued March 21, 2000
Decided May 22, 2000
Opinion
995739zs.pdf 06/06/00 13486 bytes (52 hits)
JONES v. UNITED STATES
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-5739.
Argued March 21, 2000
Decided May 22, 2000
Syllabus
99781zd.pdf 06/06/00 23806 bytes (31 hits)
AVIS RENT A CAR SYSTEM, INC., ET AL. v. OSCAR
AGUILAR ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME
COURT OF CALIFORNIA
No. 99-781.
Decided May 22, 2000
Dissent
989537zc.pdf 06/05/00 10931 bytes (88 hits)
SIMS v. APFEL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-9537.
Argued March 28, 2000
Decided June 5, 2000
Concurrence
989537zd.pdf 06/05/00 18190 bytes (35 hits)
SIMS v. APFEL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-9537.
Argued March 28, 2000
Decided June 5, 2000
Dissent
989537zo.pdf 06/05/00 28907 bytes (65 hits)
SIMS v. APFEL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-9537.
Argued March 28, 2000
Decided June 5, 2000
Opinion
989537zs.pdf 06/05/00 11302 bytes (67 hits)
SIMS v. APFEL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-9537.
Argued March 28, 2000
Decided June 5, 2000
Syllabus
99-166zc.pdf 06/05/00 25765 bytes (114 hits)
UNITED STATES v. HUBBELL
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
No. 99-166.
Argued February 22, 2000
Decided June 5, 2000
Concurrence
99-166zo.pdf 06/05/00 67805 bytes (119 hits)
UNITED STATES v. HUBBELL
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
No. 99-166.
Argued February 22, 2000
Decided June 5, 2000
Opinion
99-166zs.pdf 06/05/00 14992 bytes (132 hits)
UNITED STATES v. HUBBELL
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
No. 99-166.
Argued February 22, 2000
Decided June 5, 2000
Syllabus
99-658zo.pdf 06/05/00 34287 bytes (128 hits)
CASTILLO ET AL. v. UNITED STATES
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-658.
Argued April 24, 2000
Decided June 5, 2000
Opinion
99-658zs.pdf 06/05/00 10861 bytes (101 hits)
CASTILLO ET AL. v. UNITED STATES
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-658.
Argued April 24, 2000
Decided June 5, 2000
Syllabus
99138zc.pdf 06/05/00 18327 bytes (618 hits)
TROXEL ET VIR. v. GRANVILLE
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON
No. 99-138.
Argued January 12, 2000
Decided June 5, 2000
Concurrence
99138zc1.pdf 06/05/00 8078 bytes (356 hits)
TROXEL ET VIR. v. GRANVILLE
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON
No. 99-138.
Argued January 12, 2000
Decided June 5, 2000
Another Concurrence
99138zd.pdf 06/05/00 37152 bytes (388 hits)
TROXEL ET VIR. v. GRANVILLE
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON
No. 99-138.
Argued January 12, 2000
Decided June 5, 2000
Dissent
99138zd1.pdf 06/05/00 11792 bytes (346 hits)
TROXEL ET VIR. v. GRANVILLE
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON
No. 99-138.
Argued January 12, 2000
Decided June 5, 2000
Another Dissent
99138zd2.pdf 06/05/00 28347 bytes (327 hits)
TROXEL ET VIR. v. GRANVILLE
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON
No. 99-138.
Argued January 12, 2000
Decided June 5, 2000
Still Another Dissent
99138zo.pdf 06/05/00 45083 bytes (656 hits)
TROXEL ET VIR. v. GRANVILLE
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON
No. 99-138.
Argued January 12, 2000
Decided June 5, 2000
Opinion
99138zs.pdf 06/05/00 12826 bytes (435 hits)
TROXEL ET VIR. v. GRANVILLE
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON
No. 99-138.
Argued January 12, 2000
Decided June 5, 2000
Syllabus
99-387zo.pdf 05/30/00 29420 bytes (124 hits)
RALEIGH, CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE FOR THE ESTATE OF
STOECKER v. ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-387.
Argued April 17, 2000
Decided May 30, 2000
Opinion
99-387zs.pdf 05/30/00 10268 bytes (50 hits)
RALEIGH, CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE FOR THE ESTATE OF
STOECKER v. ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-387.
Argued April 17, 2000
Decided May 30, 2000
Syllabus
99-409zo.pdf 05/30/00 36758 bytes (74 hits)
HARTFORD UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE CO. v.
UNION PLANTERS BANK, N. A.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-409.
Argued March 20, 2000
Decided May 30, 2000
Opinion
99-409zs.pdf 05/30/00 9758 bytes (61 hits)
HARTFORD UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE CO. v.
UNION PLANTERS BANK, N. A.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-409.
Argued March 20, 2000
Decided May 30, 2000
Syllabus
981991zc.pdf 05/15/00 9681 bytes (181 hits)
PUBLIC LANDS COUNCIL ET AL. v. BABBITT,
SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-1991.
Argued March 1, 2000
Decided May 15, 2000
Concurrence
981991zo.pdf 05/15/00 62737 bytes (96 hits)
PUBLIC LANDS COUNCIL ET AL. v. BABBITT,
SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-1991.
Argued March 1, 2000
Decided May 15, 2000
Opinion
981991zs.pdf 05/15/00 12604 bytes (94 hits)
PUBLIC LANDS COUNCIL ET AL. v. BABBITT,
SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-1991.
Argued March 1, 2000
Decided May 15, 2000
Syllabus
99-116zd.pdf 05/15/00 35078 bytes (110 hits)
FISCHER v. UNITED STATES
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-116.
Argued February 22, 2000
Decided May 15, 2000
Dissent
99-116zo.pdf 05/15/00 36267 bytes (103 hits)
FISCHER v. UNITED STATES
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-116.
Argued February 22, 2000
Decided May 15, 2000
Opinion
99-116zs.pdf 05/15/00 12457 bytes (107 hits)
FISCHER v. UNITED STATES
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-116.
Argued February 22, 2000
Decided May 15, 2000
Syllabus
99-5zc.pdf 05/15/00 6760 bytes (272 hits)
UNITED STATES v. MORRISON ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-5.
Argued January 11, 2000
Decided May 15, 2000*
Concurrence
* Together with No. 99-29, Brzonkala v. Morrison
et al., also on certiorari to the same court.
99-5zd.pdf 05/15/00 83200 bytes (176 hits)
UNITED STATES v. MORRISON ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-5.
Argued January 11, 2000
Decided May 15, 2000*
Dissent
* Together with No. 99-29, Brzonkala v. Morrison
et al., also on certiorari to the same court.
99-5zd1.pdf 05/15/00 37300 bytes (167 hits)
UNITED STATES v. MORRISON ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-5.
Argued January 11, 2000
Decided May 15, 2000*
Another Dissent
* Together with No. 99-29, Brzonkala v. Morrison
et al., also on certiorari to the same court.
99-5zo.pdf 05/15/00 75480 bytes (237 hits)
UNITED STATES v. MORRISON ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-5.
Argued January 11, 2000
Decided May 15, 2000*
Opinion
* Together with No. 99-29, Brzonkala v. Morrison
et al., also on certiorari to the same court.
99-5zs.pdf 05/15/00 13427 bytes (179 hits)
UNITED STATES v. MORRISON ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-5.
Argued January 11, 2000
Decided May 15, 2000*
Syllabus
* Together with No. 99-29, Brzonkala v. Morrison
et al., also on certiorari to the same court.
995153c1.pdf 05/15/00 6395 bytes (43 hits)
JOHNSON v. UNITED STATES
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-5153.
Argued February 22, 2000
Decided May 15, 2000
Another Concurrence
995153zc.pdf 05/15/00 9594 bytes (18 hits)
JOHNSON v. UNITED STATES
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-5153.
Argued February 22, 2000
Decided May 15, 2000
Concurrence
995153zd.pdf 05/15/00 90621 bytes (20 hits)
JOHNSON v. UNITED STATES
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-5153.
Argued February 22, 2000
Decided May 15, 2000
Dissent
995153zo.pdf 05/15/00 52268 bytes (47 hits)
JOHNSON v. UNITED STATES
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-5153.
Argued February 22, 2000
Decided May 15, 2000
Opinion
995153zs.pdf 05/15/00 12201 bytes (96 hits)
JOHNSON v. UNITED STATES
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-5153.
Argued February 22, 2000
Decided May 15, 2000
Syllabus
981167c1.pdf 05/01/00 14061 bytes (251 hits)
CHRISTENSEN ET AL. v. HARRIS COUNTY ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-1167.
Argued February 23, 2000
Decided May 1, 2000
Another Concurrence
981167d1.pdf 05/01/00 9653 bytes (74 hits)
CHRISTENSEN ET AL. v. HARRIS COUNTY ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-1167.
Argued February 23, 2000
Decided May 1, 2000
Another Dissent
981167zc.pdf 05/01/00 5986 bytes (70 hits)
CHRISTENSEN ET AL. v. HARRIS COUNTY ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-1167.
Argued February 23, 2000
Decided May 1, 2000
Concurrence
981167zd.pdf 05/01/00 15786 bytes (64 hits)
CHRISTENSEN ET AL. v. HARRIS COUNTY ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-1167.
Argued February 23, 2000
Decided May 1, 2000
Dissent
981167zo.pdf 05/01/00 33636 bytes (167 hits)
CHRISTENSEN ET AL. v. HARRIS COUNTY ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-1167.
Argued February 23, 2000
Decided May 1, 2000
Opinion
981167zs.pdf 05/01/00 10852 bytes (144 hits)
CHRISTENSEN ET AL. v. HARRIS COUNTY ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-1167.
Argued February 23, 2000
Decided May 1, 2000
Syllabus
987540zd.pdf 05/01/00 68720 bytes (60 hits)
CARMELL v. TEXAS
CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TEXAS,
SECOND DISTRICT
No. 98-7540.
Argued November 30, 1999
Decided May 1, 2000
Dissent
987540zo.pdf 05/01/00 164410 bytes (67 hits)
CARMELL v. TEXAS
CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TEXAS,
SECOND DISTRICT
No. 98-7540.
Argued November 30, 1999
Decided May 1, 2000
Opinion
987540zs.pdf 05/01/00 13453 bytes (77 hits)
CARMELL v. TEXAS
CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TEXAS,
SECOND DISTRICT
No. 98-7540.
Argued November 30, 1999
Decided May 1, 2000
Syllabus
981480zd.pdf 04/26/00 28946 bytes (118 hits)
BECK v. PRUPIS ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-1480.
Argued November 3, 1999
Decided April 26, 2000
Dissent
981480zo.pdf 04/26/00 116541 bytes (75 hits)
BECK v. PRUPIS ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-1480.
Argued November 3, 1999
Decided April 26, 2000
Opinion
981480zs.pdf 04/26/00 10935 bytes (78 hits)
BECK v. PRUPIS ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-1480.
Argued November 3, 1999
Decided April 26, 2000
Syllabus
986322zc.pdf 04/26/00 8251 bytes (61 hits)
SLACK v. MCDANIEL, WARDEN, ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR
THE NINTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6322.
Argued October 4, 1999
Reargued March 29, 2000
Decided April 26, 2000
Concurrence
986322zo.pdf 04/26/00 43832 bytes (72 hits)
SLACK v. MCDANIEL, WARDEN, ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR
THE NINTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6322.
Argued October 4, 1999
Reargued March 29, 2000
Decided April 26, 2000
Opinion
986322zs.pdf 04/26/00 21462 bytes (75 hits)
SLACK v. MCDANIEL, WARDEN, ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR
THE NINTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6322.
Argued October 4, 1999
Reargued March 29, 2000
Decided April 26, 2000
Syllabus
986322zx.pdf 04/26/00 13923 bytes (37 hits)
SLACK v. MCDANIEL, WARDEN, ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR
THE NINTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6322.
Argued October 4, 1999
Reargued March 29, 2000
Decided April 26, 2000
Concurrence/Dissent
982060zc.pdf 04/25/00 18131 bytes (69 hits)
EDWARDS, WARDEN v. CARPENTER
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-2060.
Argued February 28, 2000
Decided April 25, 2000
Concurrence
982060zo.pdf 04/25/00 21440 bytes (77 hits)
EDWARDS, WARDEN v. CARPENTER
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-2060.
Argued February 28, 2000
Decided April 25, 2000
Opinion
982060zs.pdf 04/25/00 10062 bytes (69 hits)
EDWARDS, WARDEN v. CARPENTER
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-2060.
Argued February 28, 2000
Decided April 25, 2000
Syllabus
99502zo.pdf 04/25/00 29324 bytes (79 hits)
NELSON v. ADAMS USA, INC., ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT
No. 99-502.
Argued March 27, 2000
Decided April 25, 2000
Opinion
99502zs.pdf 04/25/00 12414 bytes (62 hits)
NELSON v. ADAMS USA, INC., ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT
No. 99-502.
Argued March 27, 2000
Decided April 25, 2000
Syllabus
988384zc.pdf 04/18/00 51862 bytes (238 hits)
WILLIAMS v. TAYLOR, WARDEN
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-8384.
Argued October 4, 1999
Decided April 18, 2000
Concurrence
988384zo.pdf 04/18/00 97059 bytes (99 hits)
WILLIAMS v. TAYLOR, WARDEN
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-8384.
Argued October 4, 1999
Decided April 18, 2000
Opinion
988384zs.pdf 04/18/00 18820 bytes (89 hits)
WILLIAMS v. TAYLOR, WARDEN
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-8384.
Argued October 4, 1999
Decided April 18, 2000
Syllabus
988384zx.pdf 04/18/00 13997 bytes (46 hits)
WILLIAMS v. TAYLOR, WARDEN
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-8384.
Argued October 4, 1999
Decided April 18, 2000
Concurrence/Dissent
996615zo.pdf 04/18/00 55992 bytes (68 hits)
WILLIAMS v. TAYLOR, WARDEN
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-6615.
Argued February 28, 2000
Decided April 18, 2000
Opinion
996615zs.pdf 04/18/00 15726 bytes (79 hits)
WILLIAMS v. TAYLOR, WARDEN
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-6615.
Argued February 28, 2000
Decided April 18, 2000
Syllabus
989349zd.pdf 04/17/00 17516 bytes (277 hits)
BOND v. UNITED STATES
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-9349.
Argued February 29, 2000
Decided April 17, 2000
Dissent
989349zo.pdf 04/17/00 15667 bytes (206 hits)
BOND v. UNITED STATES
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-9349.
Argued February 29, 2000
Decided April 17, 2000
Opinion
989349zs.pdf 04/17/00 9424 bytes (133 hits)
BOND v. UNITED STATES
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-9349.
Argued February 29, 2000
Decided April 17, 2000
Syllabus
99312zc.pdf 04/17/00 8133 bytes (138 hits)
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO. v. SHANKLIN,
INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF SHANKLIN
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-312.
Argued March 1, 2000
Decided April 17, 2000
Concurrence
99312zd.pdf 04/17/00 10729 bytes (80 hits)
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO. v. SHANKLIN,
INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF SHANKLIN
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-312.
Argued March 1, 2000
Decided April 17, 2000
Dissent
99312zo.pdf 04/17/00 38158 bytes (125 hits)
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO. v. SHANKLIN,
INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF SHANKLIN
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-312.
Argued March 1, 2000
Decided April 17, 2000
Opinion
99312zs.pdf 04/17/00 11183 bytes (93 hits)
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO. v. SHANKLIN,
INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF SHANKLIN
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-312.
Argued March 1, 2000
Decided April 17, 2000
Syllabus
99391zpc.pdf 04/04/00 6728 bytes (161 hits)
ROBIN FREE, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. ABBOTT
LABORATORIES, INC., ET AL.
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT
OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
[April 3, 2000]
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided
Court.
JUSTICE O’ CONNOR took no part in the
consideration or decision of this case.
981161zc.pdf 03/29/00 36067 bytes (141 hits)
CITY OF ERIE ET AL. v. PAP’ S A. M., TDBA
"KANDYLAND"
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
No. 98-1161.
Argued November 10, 1999
Decided March 29, 2000
Concurrence
981161zd.pdf 03/29/00 63536 bytes (58 hits)
CITY OF ERIE ET AL. v. PAP’ S A. M., TDBA
"KANDYLAND"
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
No. 98-1161.
Argued November 10, 1999
Decided March 29, 2000
Dissent
981161zo.pdf 03/29/00 75294 bytes (88 hits)
CITY OF ERIE ET AL. v. PAP’ S A. M., TDBA
"KANDYLAND"
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
No. 98-1161.
Argued November 10, 1999
Decided March 29, 2000
Opinion
981161zs.pdf 03/29/00 27197 bytes (87 hits)
CITY OF ERIE ET AL. v. PAP’ S A. M., TDBA
"KANDYLAND"
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
No. 98-1161.
Argued November 10, 1999
Decided March 29, 2000
Syllabus
981161zx.pdf 03/29/00 30727 bytes (66 hits)
CITY OF ERIE ET AL. v. PAP’ S A. M., TDBA
"KANDYLAND"
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
No. 98-1161.
Argued November 10, 1999
Decided March 29, 2000
Concur/Dissent
981993zc.pdf 03/28/00 11609 bytes (94 hits)
FLORIDA v. J. L.
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
No. 98 1993.
Argued February 29, 2000
Decided March 28, 2000
Concurrence
981993zo.pdf 03/28/00 27076 bytes (125 hits)
FLORIDA v. J. L.
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
No. 98 1993.
Argued February 29, 2000
Decided March 28, 2000
Opinion
981993zs.pdf 03/28/00 10484 bytes (81 hits)
FLORIDA v. J. L.
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
No. 98 1993.
Argued February 29, 2000
Decided March 28, 2000
Syllabus
99137zc.pdf 03/28/00 13055 bytes (39 hits)
GARNER, FORMER CHAIRMAN OF THE STATE
BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES OF
GEORGIA, ET AL. v. JONES
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-137.
Argued January 11, 2000
Decided March 28, 2000
Concurrence
99137zd.pdf 03/28/00 23887 bytes (24 hits)
GARNER, FORMER CHAIRMAN OF THE STATE
BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES OF
GEORGIA, ET AL. v. JONES
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-137.
Argued January 11, 2000
Decided March 28, 2000
Dissent
99137zo.pdf 03/28/00 42220 bytes (31 hits)
GARNER, FORMER CHAIRMAN OF THE STATE
BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES OF
GEORGIA, ET AL. v. JONES
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-137.
Argued January 11, 2000
Decided March 28, 2000
Opinion
99137zs.pdf 03/28/00 14614 bytes (29 hits)
GARNER, FORMER CHAIRMAN OF THE STATE
BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES OF
GEORGIA, ET AL. v. JONES
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-137.
Argued January 11, 2000
Decided March 28, 2000
Syllabus
99-697zd.pdf 03/27/00 22966 bytes (31 hits)
Dissent from Denial of Cert.
981189zc.pdf 03/22/00 35230 bytes (48 hits)
BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF
WISCONSIN SYSTEM v. SOUTHWORTH ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-1189. Argued November 9, 1999
Decided March 22, 2000
Concurrence
981189zo.pdf 03/22/00 53231 bytes (46 hits)
BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF
WISCONSIN SYSTEM v. SOUTHWORTH ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-1189. Argued November 9, 1999
Decided March 22, 2000
Opinion
981189zs.pdf 03/22/00 16338 bytes (40 hits)
BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF
WISCONSIN SYSTEM v. SOUTHWORTH ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-1189. Argued November 9, 1999
Decided March 22, 2000
Syllabus
99-150zo.pdf 03/22/00 35268 bytes (80 hits)
WAL-MART STORES, INC. v. SAMARA BROTHERS,
INC.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
No. 99-150. Argued January 19, 2000
Decided March 22, 2000
Opinion
99-150zs.pdf 03/22/00 11916 bytes (56 hits)
WAL-MART STORES, INC. v. SAMARA BROTHERS,
INC.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
No. 99-150. Argued January 19, 2000
Decided March 22, 2000
Syllabus
R021.pdf 03/21/00 25124 bytes (19 hits)
R021; 1/19/00. Anders v. California, 386 U. S.
738, sets out one procedure for determining
whether an indigent's direct appeal is frivolous,
but States are free to adopt other procedures so
long as they adequately safeguard a defendant's
Fourteenth Amendment right to appellate counsel;
California's procedure is adequate. Syllabus.
98-1037 Smith Robbins Fourteenth-Amdt. Frivolous
R021B.pdf 03/21/00 47342 bytes (7 hits)
R021B; 1/19/00. Anders v. California, 386 U. S.
738, sets out one procedure for determining
whether an indigent's direct appeal is frivolous,
but States are free to adopt other procedures so
long as they adequately safeguard a defendant's
Fourteenth Amendment right to appellate counsel;
California's procedure is adequate. Souter, J.,
dissenting.
98-1037 Smith Robbins Fourteenth-Amdt. Frivolous
R021O.pdf 03/21/00 98731 bytes (9 hits)
R021-O; 1/19/00. Anders v. California, 386 U.
S. 738, sets out one procedure for determining
whether an indigent's direct appeal is frivolous,
but States are free to adopt other procedures so
long as they adequately safeguard a defendant's
Fourteenth Amendment right to appellate counsel;
California's procedure is adequate. Thomas, J.,
opinion.
98-1037 Smith Robbins Fourteenth-Amdt. Frivolous
R022.pdf 03/21/00 17086 bytes (20 hits)
R022; 1/19/00. A defendant's exercise of
peremptory challenges pursuant to Federal Rule of
Criminal Procedure 24 is not denied or impaired
when the defendant chooses to use such a
challenge to remove a juror who should have been
excused for cause. Syllabus.
98-1255
R022B.pdf 03/21/00 9903 bytes (6 hits)
R022B; 1/19/00. A defendant's exercise of
peremptory challenges pursuant to Federal Rule of
Criminal Procedure 24 is not denied or impaired
when the defendant chooses to use such a
challenge to remove a juror who should have been
excused for cause. Scalia, J., concurring in the
judgment.
98-1255
R022O.pdf 03/21/00 42674 bytes (8 hits)
R022-O; 1/19/00. A defendant's exercise of
peremptory challenges pursuant to Federal Rule of
Criminal Procedure 24 is not denied or impaired
when the defendant chooses to use such a
challenge to remove a juror who should have been
excused for cause. Ginsburg, J., opinion.
98-1255
R036.pdf 03/21/00 20592 bytes (96 hits)
FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.
98-1152.ZS. 3/21/00. Reading the Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act as a whole, as well as in
conjunction with Congress' subsequent
tobacco-specific legislation, it is plain that
Congress has not given the Food and Drug
Administration the authority to assert
jurisdiction over tobacco products. Syllabus.
R036A.pdf 03/21/00 116086 bytes (33 hits)
FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.
98-1152.ZD. 3/21/00. Breyer, J., dissenting.
R036O.pdf 03/21/00 127909 bytes (44 hits)
FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.
98-1152.ZO. 3/21/00. O'Connor, J., opinion.
R037.pdf 03/21/00 12501 bytes (22 hits)
Cortez Byrd Chips, Inc. v. Bill Harbert Constr.
Co. 98-1960.ZS. 3/21/00. The venue provisions
of the Federal Arbitration Act are permissive,
allowing a motion to confirm, vacate, or modify
an arbitration award to be brought either in the
district where the award was made or in any
district proper under the general venue statute.
Syllabus.
R037O.pdf 03/21/00 36589 bytes (17 hits)
Cortez Byrd Chips, Inc. v. Bill Harbert Constr.
Co. 98-1960.ZO. 3/21/00. Souter, J., opinion.
989183D.pdf 03/17/00 19858 bytes (34 hits)
98-9183; Jeffrey Steven Marx, Petioner, v. Texas.
Decided November 29, 1999. Scalia, J.,
dissenting.
989741A.pdf 03/17/00 20506 bytes (29 hits)
98-9741 and 99-5291; Thomas Knight, AKA Askan
Abdullah Muhammad v. Florida and Carey Dean moore
v. Nebraska.
Decided November 8, 1999. Thomas, J., concurring.
989741D.pdf 03/17/00 33240 bytes (12 hits)
98-9741 and 99-5291; Thomas Knight, AKA Askan
Abdullah Muhammad v. Florida and Carey Dean moore
v. Nebraska.
Decided November 8, 1999. Breyer, J., dissenting.
99323D.pdf 03/17/00 18771 bytes (12 hits)
99-323; Edward Hanousek, Jr. v. United States.
Decided January 10, 2000. Thomas, J., dissenting.
R020.pdf 03/15/00 10865 bytes (10 hits)
R020; 1/19/00. The Guam Organic Act does not
require a runoff election when a candidate slate
has received a majority of the votes cast for
Governor and Lieutenant Governor of the
Territory, but not a majority of the number of
ballots cast in the simultaneous general
election. Syllabus.
99-51 Syllabus Gutierrez Ada Souter,J. 48USC1422
Elections Votes
R033.pdf 03/10/00 10051 bytes (20 hits)
R033; 3/1/00. This Court is bound by the
controlling statute, 18 U. S. C. sec. 3624(e),
which, by its necessary operation, does not
reduce the length of a supervised release term by
reason of excess time served in prison.
Syllabus.
98-1696
R0330.pdf 03/10/00 4521 bytes (8 hits)
R033-O; 3/1/00. This Court is bound by the
controlling statute, 18 U. S. C. sec. 3624(e),
which, by its necessary operation, does not
reduce the length of a supervised release term by
reason of excess time served in prison. Kennedy,
J., opinion.
98-1696
R034.pdf 03/10/00 12664 bytes (17 hits)
R034; 3/6/00. A prosecutor's comments that
respondent had the opportunity to hear all other
witnesses before testifying and tailor his
testimony accordingly did not violate his Fifth
and Sixth Amendment rights to be present at trial
and confront his accusers or his Fourteenth
Amendment right to due process. Syllabus.
98-1170 Portuondo
R034A.pdf 03/10/00 8646 bytes (13 hits)
R034A; 3/6/00. A prosecutor's comments that
respondent had the opportunity to hear all other
witnesses before testifying and tailor his
testimony accordingly did not violate his Fifth
and Sixth Amendment rights to be present at trial
and confront his accusers or his Fourteenth
Amendment right to due process. Stevens, J.,
concurring in the judgment.
98-1170 Portuondo
R034B.pdf 03/10/00 46646 bytes (9 hits)
R034B; 3/6/00. A prosecutor's comments that
respondent had the opportunity to hear all other
witnesses before testifying and tailor his
testimony accordingly did not violate his Fifth
and Sixth Amendment rights to be present at trial
and confront his accusers or his Fourteenth
Amendment right to due process. Ginsburg, J.,
dissenting.
98-1170 Portuondo
R034O.pdf 03/10/00 50972 bytes (17 hits)
R034-O; 3/6/00. A prosecutor's comments that
respondent had the opportunity to hear all other
witnesses before testifying and tailor his
testimony accordingly did not violate his Fifth
and Sixth Amendment rights to be present at trial
and confront his accusers or his Fourteenth
Amendment right to due process. Scalia, J.,
opinion.
98-1170 Portuondo
R035.pdf 03/10/00 19302 bytes (13 hits)
R035; 3/6/00. Washington's supertanker
regulations regarding general navigation watch
procedures, crew English language skills and
training, and maritime casualty reporting are
pre-empted by a comprehensive federal regulatory
scheme; the case is remanded so the validity of
other state regulations may be assessed in light
of the considerable federal interest at stake.
Syllabus.
98-1701 Syllabus 98-1706 Locke U.S. Kennedy,J.
Supertankers Pre-emption
R035O.pdf 03/10/00 85717 bytes (13 hits)
R035-O; 3/6/00. Washington's supertanker
regulations regarding general navigation watch
procedures, crew English language skills and
training, and maritime casualty reporting are
pre-empted by a comprehensive federal regulatory
scheme; the case is remanded so the validity of
other state regulations may be assessed in light
of the considerable federal interest at stake.
Kennedy, J., opinion.
98-1701 98-1706 Locke U.S.
R012.pdf 03/08/00 19879 bytes (32 hits)
R012; 1/11/00. Although the Age Discrimination
in Employment Act of 1967 contains a clear
statement of Congress' intent to abrogate the
States' Eleventh Amendment immunity, that
abrogation exceeded Congress' authority under
sec. 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment. Syllabus.
98-791 O'Connor,J.
R012A.pdf 03/08/00 28367 bytes (19 hits)
R012A; 1/11/00. Although the Age Discrimination
in Employment Act of 1967 contains a clear
statement of Congress' intent to abrogate the
States' Eleventh Amendment immunity, that
abrogation exceeded Congress' authority under
sec. 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment. O'Connor,
J., Opinion.
98-791 O'Connor,J.
R012B.pdf 03/08/00 43448 bytes (11 hits)
R012B; 1/11/00. Although the Age Discrimination
in Employment Act of 1967 contains a clear
statement of Congress' intent to abrogate the
States' Eleventh Amendment immunity, that
abrogation exceeded Congress' authority under
sec. 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment. Thomas, J.,
concurring in part and dissenting in part.
98-791 Kimel Florida-Bd.-of-Regents ADEA
Eleventh-Amdt. Sovereign-immunity
R012O.pdf 03/08/00 96738 bytes (19 hits)
R012-O; 1/11/00. Although the Age Discrimination
in Employment Act of 1967 contains a clear
statement of Congress' intent to abrogate the
States' Eleventh Amendment immunity, that
abrogation exceeded Congress' authority under
sec. 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment. O'Connor,
J., opinion.
98-791 Kimel Florida-Bd.-of-Regents ADEA
Eleventh-Amdt. Sovereign-immunity
R017.pdf 03/08/00 26458 bytes (16 hits)
R017; 1/12/00. The Fourth Circuit erred in
concluding that a citizen suitor's Clean Water
Act civil penalties claim must be dismissed as
moot when the defendant, after commencement of
the suit, has come into compliance with its
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
permit. Syllabus.
98-822 Friends-of-Earth-Inc. Laidlaw-Environmenta
l 33USC1365 Clean-Water-Act Mootness
R017A.pdf 03/08/00 12269 bytes (10 hits)
R017A; 1/12/00. The Fourth Circuit erred in
concluding that a citizen suitor's Clean Water
Act civil penalties claim must be dismissed as
moot when the defendant, after commencement of
the suit, has come into compliance with its
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
permit. Stevens, J., concurring.
98-822 Friends-of-Earth-Inc. Laidlaw-Environmenta
l 33USC1365 Clean-Water-Act Mootness
R017B.pdf 03/08/00 6781 bytes (8 hits)
R017B; 1/12/00. The Fourth Circuit erred in
concluding that a citizen suitor's Clean Water
Act civil penalties claim must be dismissed as
moot when the defendant, after commencement of
the suit, has come into compliance with its
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
permit. Kennedy, J., concurring.
98-822 Friends-of-Earth-Inc. Laidlaw-Environmenta
l 33USC1365 Clean-Water-Act Mootness
R017C.pdf 03/08/00 68823 bytes (7 hits)
R017C; 1/12/00. The Fourth Circuit erred in
concluding that a citizen suitor's Clean Water
Act civil penalties claim must be dismissed as
moot when the defendant, after commencement of
the suit, has come into compliance with its
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
permit. Scalia, J., dissenting.
98-822 Friends-of-Earth-Inc. Laidlaw-Environmenta
l 33USC1365 Clean-Water-Act Mootness
R017O.pdf 03/08/00 82629 bytes (37 hits)
R017-O; 1/12/00. The Fourth Circuit erred in
concluding that a citizen suitor's Clean Water
Act civil penalties claim must be dismissed as
moot when the defendant, after commencement of
the suit, has come into compliance with its
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
permit. Ginsburg, J., opinion.
98-822 Friends-of-Earth-Inc. Laidlaw-Environmenta
l 33USC1365 Clean-Water-Act Mootness
R018.pdf 03/08/00 31004 bytes (10 hits)
R018; 1/12/00. The Tenth Circuit erred in
concluding that petitioner's suit challenging the
U. S. Department of Transportation's procedure
for certifying contractors as disadvantaged
business enterprises should be dismissed as moot
after petitioner was so certified by Colorado's
Department of Transportation. Per Curiam.
99-295 PerCuriam Adarand-Constructors Slater
Mootness Burden-of-proof Govt.-contractor
Dept.-of-Transp.
R008.pdf 03/02/00 17815 bytes (24 hits)
R008; 11/29/99. Insofar as the Fifth Circuit
held that petitioners were not entitled to
summary judgment on respondent's 42 U. S. C. sec.
1983 claim for damages relating to a state
university's rejection of his admission
application, even if he would have been denied
admission under a race-neutral policy, its
decision contradicts Mt. Healthy City Bd. of Ed.
v. Doyle, 429 U. S. 274. Per Curiam.
PerCuriam 42USC1983 Race-discrim. Texas Lesage
College-admissions Civil-rights Summary-judgment
R010.pdf 03/02/00 11410 bytes (21 hits)
R010; 12/7/99. Respondent publishing company is
not entitled to prevail on a First Amendment
"facial attack" on Cal. Govt. Code sec.
6254(f)(3), which restricts public access to
arrestee addresses in the possession of state and
local law enforcement agencies. Syllabus.
98-678 Syllabus Los-Angeles-Police-Dept.
United-Reporting-Pub. Rehnquist,C.J. California
First-Admt. Free-Speech
R010A.pdf 03/02/00 9254 bytes (9 hits)
R010A; 12/7/99. Respondent publishing company is
not entitled to prevail on a First Amendment
"facial attack" on Cal. Govt. Code sec.
6254(f)(3), which restricts public access to
arrestee addresses in the possession of state and
local law enforcement agencies. Scalia, J.,
concurring.
98-678 Concur Los-Angeles-Police-Dept.
United-Reporting-Pub. California First-Admt.
Free-Speech
R010B.pdf 03/02/00 10605 bytes (8 hits)
R010B; 12/7/99. Respondent publishing company is
not entitled to prevail on a First Amendment
"facial attack" on Cal. Govt. Code sec.
6254(f)(3), which restricts public access to
arrestee addresses in the possession of state and
local law enforcement agencies. Ginsburg, J.,
concurring.
98-678 Concur Los-Angeles-Police-Dept.
United-Reporting-Pub. California First-Admt.
Free-Speech
R010C.pdf 03/02/00 21513 bytes (8 hits)
R010C; 12/7/99. Respondent publishing company is
not entitled to prevail on a First Amendment
"facial attack" on Cal. Govt. Code sec.
6254(f)(3), which restricts public access to
arrestee addresses in the possession of state and
local law enforcement agencies. Stevens, J.,
dissenting.
98-678 Dissent Los-Angeles-Police-Dept.
United-Reporting-Pub. California First-Admt.
Free-Speech
R010O.pdf 03/02/00 29914 bytes (13 hits)
R010-O; 12/7/99. Respondent publishing company
is not entitled to prevail on a First Amendment
"facial attack" on Cal. Govt. Code sec.
6254(f)(3), which restricts public access to
arrestee addresses in the possession of state and
local law enforcement agencies. Rehnquist, C.
J., opinion.
98-678 Opinion Los-Angeles-Police-Dept.
United-Reporting-Pub. California First-Admt.
Free-Speech
R011.pdf 03/02/00 16087 bytes (12 hits)
R011; 12/7/99. Petitioner's interest as heir to
his mother's estate constituted "property" or a
"righ[t] to property" to which federal tax liens
attached under 26 U. S. C. sec. 6321, despite
petitioner's exercise of the prerogative state
law accorded him to disclaim the interest
retroactively. Syllabus.
98-1101 Drye United-States 26USC6321
Federal-taxes Disclaimer
R011O.pdf 03/02/00 39994 bytes (14 hits)
R011-O; 12/7/99. Petitioner's interest as heir to
his mother's estate constituted "property" or a
"righ[t] to property" to which federal tax liens
attached under 26 U. S. C. sec. 6321, despite
petitioner's exercise of the prerogative state
law accorded him to disclaim the interest
retroactively. Ginsburg, J., opinion.
98-1101 Drye United-States 26USC6321
Federal-taxes Disclaimer
R013.pdf 03/02/00 10197 bytes (6 hits)
R013; 1/11/00. Defense counsel's agreement to a
trial date outside the time period set by the
Interstate Agreement on Detainers bars the
defendant from seeking dismissal because trial
did not occur within that period. Syllabus.
98-1299
R013O.pdf 03/02/00 32941 bytes (9 hits)
R013-O; 1/11/00. Defense counsel's agreement to a
trial date outside the time period set by the
Interstate Agreement on Detainers bars the
defendant from seeking dismissal because trial
did not occur within that period. Scalia, J.,
opinion.
98-1299
R014.pdf 03/02/00 12581 bytes (47 hits)
R014; 1/12/00. Police officers did not violate
the Fourth Amendment when they stopped and
searched respondent, who fled an area known for
heavy narcotics trafficking upon seeing a police
caravan. Syllabus.
98-1036 Illinois Wardlow Stop-and-frisk
Fourth-Amdt. Terry-stop
R014A.pdf 03/02/00 57630 bytes (20 hits)
R014A; 1/12/00. Police officers did not violate
the Fourth Amendment when they stopped and
searched respondent, who fled an area known for
heavy narcotics trafficking upon seeing a police
caravan. Stevens, J., concurring in part and
dissenting in part.
98-1036 Illinois Wardlow Stop-and-frisk
Fourth-Amdt. Terry-stop
R014O.pdf 03/02/00 23868 bytes (38 hits)
R014-O; 1/12/00. Police officers did not violate
the Fourth Amendment when they stopped and
searched respondent, who fled an area known for
heavy narcotics trafficking upon seeing a police
caravan. Rehnquist, C. J., opinion.
98-1036 Illinois Wardlow Stop-and-frisk
Fourth-Amdt. Terry-stop
R015.pdf 03/02/00 12657 bytes (14 hits)
R015; 1/12/00. In enacting the Driver's Privacy
Protection Act of 1994, which restricts the
dissemination and sale of information contained
in state motor vehicle records, Congress did not
run afoul of the federalism principles enunciated
in New York v. United States, 505 U. S. 144, and
Printz v. United States, 521 U. S. 898.
Syllabus.
98-1464 Syllabus Reno Condon 18USC2721-2725
Rehnquist,C.J. Federalism DPPA
R015O.pdf 03/02/00 34712 bytes (19 hits)
R015-O; 1/12/00. In enacting the Driver's
Privacy Protection Act of 1994, which restricts
the dissemination and sale of information
contained in state motor vehicle records,
Congress did not run afoul of the federalism
principles enunciated in New York v. United
States, 505 U. S. 144, and Printz v. United
States, 521 U. S. 898. Rehnquist, C. J., opinion
98-1464 Opinion Reno Condon 18USC2721-2725
Rehnquist,C.J. Federalism DPPA
R016.pdf 03/02/00 13335 bytes (15 hits)
R016; 1/12/00. Neither the holding nor the
reasoning of Faretta v. California, 422 U. S.
806, requires a State to recognize a
constitutional right to self-representation on
direct appeal from a criminal conviction.
Syllabus.
98-7809
R016A.pdf 03/02/00 7319 bytes (6 hits)
R016A; 1/12/00. Neither the holding nor the
reasoning of Faretta v. California, 422 U. S.
806, requires a State to recognize a
constitutional right to self-representation on
direct appeal from a criminal conviction.
Kennedy, J., concurring.
Martinez
R016B.pdf 03/02/00 8114 bytes (5 hits)
R016B; 1/12/00. Neither the holding nor the
reasoning of Faretta v. California, 422 U. S.
806, requires a State to recognize a
constitutional right to self-representation on
direct appeal from a criminal conviction.
Breyer, J., concurring.
Martinez
R016C.pdf 03/02/00 10629 bytes (6 hits)
R016C; 1/12/00. Neither the holding nor the
reasoning of Faretta v. California, 422 U. S.
806, requires a State to recognize a
constitutional right to self-representation on
direct appeal from a criminal conviction.
Scalia, J., concurring in the judgment.
Martinez
R016O.pdf 03/02/00 46503 bytes (8 hits)
R016-O; 1/12/00. Neither the holding nor the
reasoning of Faretta v. California, 422 U. S.
806, requires a State to recognize a
constitutional right to self-representation on
direct appeal from a criminal conviction.
Stevens, J., opinion.
Martinez
R023.pdf 03/02/00 16262 bytes (5 hits)
R023; 1/24/00. In light of the language of sec.
5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and the
Court's holding in Beer v. United States, 425 U.
S. 130, sec. 5 does not prohibit preclearance of
a redistricting plan enacted with a
discriminatory but nonretrogressive purpose.
Syllabus.
98-405 Reno Bossier-Parish-School-Bd. Price
Redistricting Voting-rights
R023A.pdf 03/02/00 7014 bytes (4 hits)
R023A; 1/24/00. In light of the language of sec.
5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and the
Court's holding in Beer v. United States, 425 U.
S. 130, sec. 5 does not prohibit preclearance of
a redistricting plan enacted with a
discriminatory but nonretrogressive purpose.
Thomas, J., concurring.
98-405 Reno Bossier-Parish-School-Bd. Price
Redistricting Voting-rights
R023B.pdf 03/02/00 109772 bytes (5 hits)
R023B; 1/24/00. In light of the language of sec.
5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and the
Court's holding in Beer v. United States, 425 U.
S. 130, sec. 5 does not prohibit preclearance of
a redistricting plan enacted with a
discriminatory but nonretrogressive purpose.
Souter, J., concurring in part and dissenting in
part.
98-405 Reno Bossier-Parish-School-Bd. Price
Redistricting Voting-rights
R023C.pdf 03/02/00 9862 bytes (4 hits)
R023C; 1/24/00. In light of the language of sec.
5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and the
Court's holding in Beer v. United States, 425 U.
S. 130, sec. 5 does not prohibit preclearance of
a redistricting plan enacted with a
discriminatory but nonretrogressive purpose.
Stevens, J., dissenting.
98-405 Reno Bossier-Parish-School-Bd. Price
Redistricting Voting-rights
R023D.pdf 03/02/00 15731 bytes (5 hits)
R023D; 1/24/00. In light of the language of sec.
5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and the
Court's holding in Beer v. United States, 425 U.
S. 130, sec. 5 does not prohibit preclearance of
a redistricting plan enacted with a
discriminatory but nonretrogressive purpose.
Breyer, J., dissenting.
98-405 Reno Bossier-Parish-School-Bd. Price
Redistricting Voting-rights
R023O.pdf 03/02/00 68783 bytes (5 hits)
R023-O; 1/24/00. In light of the language of
sec. 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and the
Court's holding in Beer v. United States, 425 U.
S. 130, sec. 5 does not prohibit preclearance of
a redistricting plan enacted with a
discriminatory but nonretrogressive purpose.
Scalia, J., opinion.
98-405 Reno Bossier-Parish-School-Bd. Price
Redistricting Voting-rights
R024.pdf 03/02/00 20195 bytes (13 hits)
R024; 1/24/00. Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U. S. 1
(per curiam) is authority for state limits on
contributions to state political candidates, and
those limits need not be pegged to the federal
limits approved in Buckley. Syllabus.
98-963 Nixon Shrink-Mo.-Govt.-PAC Elections
Buckley First-Amdt.
R024A.pdf 03/02/00 10968 bytes (9 hits)
R024A; 1/24/00. Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U. S. 1
(per curiam) is authority for state limits on
contributions to state political candidates, and
those limits need not be pegged to the federal
limits approved in Buckley. Stevens, J.,
concurring.
98-963 Nixon Shrink-Mo.-Govt.-PAC Elections
Buckley First-Amdt.
R024B.pdf 03/02/00 27594 bytes (8 hits)
R024B; 1/24/00. Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U. S. 1
(per curiam) is authority for state limits on
contributions to state political candidates, and
those limits need not be pegged to the federal
limits approved in Buckley. Breyer, J.,
concurring.
98-963 Nixon Shrink-Mo.-Govt.-PAC Elections
Buckley First-Amdt.
R024C.pdf 03/02/00 20659 bytes (9 hits)
R024C; 1/24/00. Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U. S. 1
(per curiam) is authority for state limits on
contributions to state political candidates, and
those limits need not be pegged to the federal
limits approved in Buckley. Kennedy, J.,
dissenting.
98-963 Nixon Shrink-Mo.-Govt.-PAC Elections
Buckley First-Amdt.
R024D.pdf 03/02/00 82186 bytes (6 hits)
R024D; 1/24/00. Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U. S. 1
(per curiam) is authority for state limits on
contributions to state political candidates, and
those limits need not be pegged to the federal
limits approved in Buckley. Thomas, J.,
dissenting.
98-963 Nixon Shrink-Mo.-Govt.-PAC Elections
Buckley First-Amdt.
R024O.pdf 03/02/00 64872 bytes (7 hits)
R024-O; 1/24/00. Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U. S. 1
(per curiam) is authority for state limits on
contributions to state political candidates, and
those limits need not be pegged to the federal
limits approved in Buckley. Souter, J., opinion.
98-963 Nixon Shrink-Mo.-Govt.-PAC Elections
Buckley First-Amdt.
R025.pdf 03/02/00 10362 bytes (7 hits)
R025; 2/22/00. Remittances of estimated income
tax and withholding tax are "paid" on the due
date of a calendar year taxpayer's income tax
return. Syllabus.
98-1667
R025O.pdf 03/02/00 30316 bytes (13 hits)
R025-O; 2/22/00. Remittances of estimated income
tax and withholding tax are "paid" on the due
date of a calendar year taxpayer's income tax
return. Opinion.
98-1667
R026.pdf 03/02/00 15875 bytes (17 hits)
R026; 2/22/00. Fed. Rule Civ. Proc. 50 permits
an appellate court to direct the entry of
judgment as a matter of law when it determines
that evidence was erroneously admitted at trial
and that the remaining, properly admitted,
evidence is insufficient to constitute a
submissible case. Syllabus.
99-161Weisgram Marley-Co. Appeals F.R.Civ.P.50
Directed-judgment
R026O.pdf 03/02/00 55397 bytes (13 hits)
R026-O; 2/22/00. Fed. Rule Civ. Proc. 50 permits
an appellate court to direct the entry of
judgment as a matter of law when it determines
that evidence was erroneously admitted at trial
and that the remaining, properly admitted,
evidence is insufficient to constitute a
submissible case. Opinion.
99-161Weisgram Marley-Co. Appeals F.R.Civ.P.50
Directed-judgment
R027.pdf 03/02/00 12052 bytes (9 hits)
R027; 2/22/00. Because California's interest
deduction offset provision is not a reasonable
allocation of expense deductions to the income
that the expense generates, it constitutes
impermissible taxation of income outside the
State's jurisdictional reach in violation of the
Federal Constitution's Due Process and Commerce
Clauses. Syllabus.
98-2043
R027O.pdf 03/02/00 33662 bytes (10 hits)
R027-O; 2/22/00. Because California's interest
deduction offset provision is not a reasonable
allocation of expense deductions to the income
that the expense generates, it constitutes
impermissible taxation of income outside the
State's jurisdictional reach in violation of the
Federal Constitution's Due Process and Commerce
Clauses. Opinion.
98-2043
R028.pdf 03/02/00 16460 bytes (8 hits)
R028; 2/23/00. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.
S. 668, provides the proper framework for
evaluating a claim that counsel was
constitutionally ineffective for failing to file
a notice of appeal: counsel's representation must
fall below an objective standard of
reasonableness and must have prejudiced the
defendant. Syllabus.
98-1441 Roe Flores-Ortega Right-to-counsel
Notice-of-appeal Sixth-Amdt.
R028A.pdf 03/02/00 6739 bytes (6 hits)
R028A; 2/23/00. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.
S. 668, provides the proper framework for
evaluating a claim that counsel was
constitutionally ineffective for failing to file
a notice of appeal: counsel's representation must
fall below an objective standard of
reasonableness and must have prejudiced the
defendant. Breyer, J., concurring.
98-1441 Roe Flores-Ortega Right-to-counsel
Notice-of-appeal Sixth-Amdt.
R028B.pdf 03/02/00 25106 bytes (6 hits)
R028B; 2/23/00. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.
S. 668, provides the proper framework for
evaluating a claim that counsel was
constitutionally ineffective for failing to file
a notice of appeal: counsel's representation must
fall below an objective standard of
reasonableness and must have prejudiced the
defendant. Souter, J., concurring in part and
dissenting in part.
98-1441 Roe Flores-Ortega Right-to-counsel
Notice-of-appeal Sixth-Amdt.
R028C.pdf 03/02/00 6820 bytes (5 hits)
R028C; 2/23/00. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.
S. 668, provides the proper framework for
evaluating a claim that counsel was
constitutionally ineffective for failing to file
a notice of appeal: counsel's representation must
fall below an objective standard of
reasonableness and must have prejudiced the
defendant. Ginsburg, J., concurring in part and
dissenting in part.
98-1441 Roe Flores-Ortega Right-to-counsel
Notice-of-appeal Sixth-Amdt.
R028O.pdf 03/02/00 54251 bytes (8 hits)
R028-O; 2/23/00. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.
S. 668, provides the proper framework for
evaluating a claim that counsel was
constitutionally ineffective for failing to file
a notice of appeal: counsel's representation must
fall below an objective standard of
reasonableness and must have prejudiced the
defendant. Opinion.
98-1441 Roe Flores-Ortega Right-to-counsel
Notice-of-appeal Sixth-Amdt.
R029.pdf 03/02/00 16089 bytes (15 hits)
R029; 2/23/00. The Fifteenth Amendment
invalidates a Hawaii electoral qualification that
permits only "Hawaiians"-descendants of persons
inhabiting Hawaii in 1778-to vote for trustees of
a state agency that administers programs
benefiting "native Hawaiians" and "Hawaiians."
Syllabus.
98-818 Rice Cayetano Hawaii Fifteenth-Amdt.
Right-to-vote
R029A.pdf 03/02/00 16306 bytes (10 hits)
R029A; 2/23/00. The Fifteenth Amendment
invalidates a Hawaii electoral qualification that
permits only "Hawaiians"-descendants of persons
inhabiting Hawaii in 1778-to vote for trustees of
a state agency that administers programs
benefiting "native Hawaiians" and "Hawaiians."
Breyer, J., concurring in the result.
98-818 Rice Cayetano Hawaii Fifteenth-Amdt.
Right-to-vote
R029B.pdf 03/02/00 75336 bytes (8 hits)
R029B; 2/23/00. The Fifteenth Amendment
invalidates a Hawaii electoral qualification that
permits only "Hawaiians"-descendants of persons
inhabiting Hawaii in 1778-to vote for trustees of
a state agency that administers programs
benefiting "native Hawaiians" and "Hawaiians."
Stevens, J., dissenting.
98-818 Rice Cayetano Hawaii Fifteenth-Amdt.
Right-to-vote
R029C.pdf 03/02/00 7747 bytes (10 hits)
R029C; 2/23/00. The Fifteenth Amendment
invalidates a Hawaii electoral qualification that
permits only "Hawaiians"-descendants of persons
inhabiting Hawaii in 1778-to vote for trustees of
a state agency that administers programs
benefiting "native Hawaiians" and "Hawaiians."
Ginsburg, J., dissenting.
98-818 Rice Cayetano Hawaii Fifteenth-Amdt.
Right-to-vote
R029O.pdf 03/02/00 81852 bytes (11 hits)
R029); 2/23/00. The Fifteenth Amendment
invalidates a Hawaii electoral qualification that
permits only "Hawaiians"-descendants of persons
inhabiting Hawaii in 1778-to vote for trustees of
a state agency that administers programs
benefiting "native Hawaiians" and "Hawaiians."
Opinion.
98-818 Rice Cayetano Hawaii Fifteenth-Amdt.
Right-to-vote
R030.pdf 03/02/00 13594 bytes (8 hits)
R030; 2/23/00. The 4-year limitations period for
a civil RICO claim is not governed by an injury
and pattern discovery rule that starts only when
the claimant discovers, or should discover, both
an injury and pattern of RICO activity.
Syllabus.
98-896 Rotella Wood RICO Limitations
R030O.pdf 03/02/00 39349 bytes (16 hits)
R030-O; 2/23/00. The 4-year limitations period
for a civil RICO claim is not governed by an
injury and pattern discovery rule that starts
only when the claimant discovers, or should
discover, both an injury and pattern of RICO
activity. Opinion.
98-896 Rotella Wood RICO Limitations
R031.pdf 03/02/00 12987 bytes (22 hits)
R031; 2/23/00. The Equal Protection Clause gives
rise to a cause of action on behalf of a "class
of one," where a plaintiff alleges that she has
been intentionally treated differently from
others similarly situated and that there is no
rational basis for such treatment. Per Curiam.
98-1288 PerCuriam Willowbrook-Village
R031A.pdf 03/02/00 9108 bytes (19 hits)
R031A; 2/23/00. The Equal Protection Clause
gives rise to a cause of action on behalf of a
"class of one," where a plaintiff alleges that
she has been intentionally treated differently
from others similarly situated and that there is
no rational basis for such treatment. Breyer,
J., concurring in the result.
98-1288 Concur Willowbrook-Village Olech
Equal-protection Fourteenth-Amdt. Class-of-one
R032.pdf 03/02/00 20091 bytes (12 hits)
R032; 2/29/00. Title 42 U. S. C. 405(h), part of
a special system of administrative and judicial
review for denials of Medicare claims, bars
respondent nursing home association from invoking
federal-question jurisdiction to challenge the
validity of Medicare enforcement regulations.
Syllabus.
98-1109 Shalala Illinois-Long-Term-Care
Jurisdiction Medicare Nursing-homes
R032A.pdf 03/02/00 10505 bytes (6 hits)
R032A; 2/29/00. Title 42 U. S. C. 405(h), part
of a special system of administrative and
judicial review for denials of Medicare claims,
bars respondent nursing home association from
invoking federal-question jurisdiction to
challenge the validity of Medicare enforcement
regulations. Stevens, J., dissenting.
98-1109 Shalala Illinois-Long-Term-Care
Jurisdiction Medicare Nursing-homes
R032B.pdf 03/02/00 9561 bytes (6 hits)
R032B; 2/29/00. Title 42 U. S. C. 405(h), part
of a special system of administrative and
judicial review for denials of Medicare claims,
bars respondent nursing home association from
invoking federal-question jurisdiction to
challenge the validity of Medicare enforcement
regulations. Scalia, J., dissenting.
98-1109 Shalala Illinois-Long-Term-Care
Jurisdiction Medicare Nursing-homes
R032C.pdf 03/02/00 79767 bytes (9 hits)
R032C; 2/29/00. Title 42 U. S. C. 405(h), part
of a special system of administrative and
judicial review for denials of Medicare claims,
bars respondent nursing home association from
invoking federal-question jurisdiction to
challenge the validity of Medicare enforcement
regulations. Thomas, J., dissenting.
98-1109 Shalala Illinois-Long-Term-Care
Jurisdiction Medicare Nursing-homes
R032O.pdf 03/02/00 90092 bytes (7 hits)
R032-O; 2/29/00. Title 42 U. S. C. 405(h), part
of a special system of administrative and
judicial review for denials of Medicare claims,
bars respondent nursing home association from
invoking federal-question jurisdiction to
challenge the validity of Medicare enforcement
regulations. Breyer, J., opinion.
98-1109 Shalala Illinois-Long-Term-Care
Jurisdiction Medicare Nursing-homes
9995ZA.PDF 11/15/99 7150 bytes (174 hits)
Excel Communications, Inc., et al. v. AT&T Corp.
On petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United
States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
No. 99-95. Decided October 12, 1999.
The petition for writ of certiorari is denied.
R001.pdf 11/15/99 13250 bytes (80 hits)
R001; 10/12/99. Abusive filer is denied leave to
proceed in forma pauperis on all future
certiorari petitions in noncriminal cases. Per
Curiam.
98-9913 PerCuriam Brancato Gunn Abusive-filings
Frivolous IFP Certiorari
R002.pdf 11/15/99 9636 bytes (33 hits)
R002; 10/12/99. Abusive filer is denied leave to
proceed in forma pauperis on all future
certiorari and extraordinary writ petitions in
noncriminal cases. Per Curiam.
98-9933 PerCuriam 99-5445 Antonelli Caridine IFP
Abusive-filings U.S.
R003.pdf 11/15/99 9207 bytes (29 hits)
R003; 10/12/99. Abusive filer is denied leave to
proceed in forma pauperis on all future
certiorari and extraordinary writ petitions in
noncriminal cases. Per Curiam.
99-5260 PerCuriam Judd U.-S.-District-Court IFP
Abusive-filings Frivolous Certiorari
R004.pdf 11/15/99 9170 bytes (17 hits)
R004; 10/12/99. Abusive filer is denied leave to
proceed in forma pauperis on all future
certiorari and extraordinary w