The Federal Bulletin Board Online via GPO AccessThe Federal Bulletin Board Online via GPO Access
The Federal Bulletin Board (FBB) is a free electronic bulletin board service of the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office (GPO). All file library documents can be downloaded for free.
R010.txt 10/12/00 5100 bytes (49 hits)
R010; 12/7/99. Respondent publishing company is
not entitled to prevail on a First Amendment
"facial attack" on Cal. Govt. Code sec.
6254(f)(3), which restricts public access to
arrestee addresses in the possession of state and
local law enforcement agencies. Syllabus.
98-678
R010A.txt 10/12/00 3151 bytes (13 hits)
R010A; 12/7/99. Respondent publishing company is
not entitled to prevail on a First Amendment
"facial attack" on Cal. Govt. Code sec.
6254(f)(3), which restricts public access to
arrestee addresses in the possession of state and
local law enforcement agencies. Scalia, J.,
concurring.
Los-Angeles-Police-Dept. United-Reporting-Pub.
Scalia,J. California First-Admt. Free-Speech
Concur
R010B.txt 10/12/00 4563 bytes (9 hits)
R010B; 12/7/99. Respondent publishing company is
not entitled to prevail on a First Amendment
"facial attack" on Cal. Govt. Code sec.
6254(f)(3), which restricts public access to
arrestee addresses in the possession of state and
local law enforcement agencies. Ginsburg, J.,
concurring.
Los-Angeles-Police-Dept. United-Reporting-Pub.
Ginsburg,J. California First-Admt. Free-Speech
Concur
R010C.txt 10/12/00 12640 bytes (4 hits)
R010C; 12/7/99. Respondent publishing company is
not entitled to prevail on a First Amendment
"facial attack" on Cal. Govt. Code sec.
6254(f)(3), which restricts public access to
arrestee addresses in the possession of state and
local law enforcement agencies. Stevens, J.,
concurring.
Los-Angeles-Police-Dept. United-Reporting-Pub.
Stevens,J. California First-Admt. Free-Speech
Dissent
R010O.txt 10/12/00 19705 bytes (4 hits)
R010O; 12/7/99. Respondent publishing company is
not entitled to prevail on a First Amendment
"facial attack" on Cal. Govt. Code sec.
6254(f)(3), which restricts public access to
arrestee addresses in the possession of state and
local law enforcement agencies. Opinion
Los-Angeles-Police-Dept. United-Reporting-Pub.
Stevens,J. California First-Admt. Free-Speech
Opinion
R023.txt 10/12/00 9178 bytes (7 hits)
R023; 1/24/00. In light of the language of sec.
5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and the
Court's holding in Beer v. United States, 425 U.
S. 130, sec. 5 does not prohibit preclearance of
a redistricting plan enacted with a
discriminatory but nonretrogressive purpose.
Syllabus.
98-405 Reno Bossier-Parish-School-Bd. Price
Redistricting Voting-rights
R023A.txt 10/12/00 1848 bytes (3 hits)
R023A; 1/24/00. In light of the language of sec.
5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and the
Court's holding in Beer v. United States, 425 U.
S. 130, sec. 5 does not prohibit preclearance of
a redistricting plan enacted with a
discriminatory but nonretrogressive purpose.
Thomas, J., concurring.
98-405 Reno Bossier-Parish-School-Bd. Price
Redistricting Voting-rights
R023B.txt 10/12/00 78582 bytes (3 hits)
R023B; 1/24/00. In light of the language of sec.
5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and the
Court's holding in Beer v. United States, 425 U.
S. 130, sec. 5 does not prohibit preclearance of
a redistricting plan enacted with a
discriminatory but nonretrogressive purpose.
Souter, J., concurring in part and dissenting in
part.
98-405 Reno Bossier-Parish-School-Bd. Price
Redistricting Voting-rights
R023C.txt 10/12/00 3856 bytes (3 hits)
R023C; 1/24/00. In light of the language of sec.
5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and the
Court's holding in Beer v. United States, 425 U.
S. 130, sec. 5 does not prohibit preclearance of
a redistricting plan enacted with a
discriminatory but nonretrogressive purpose.
Stevens, J., dissenting.
98-405 Reno Bossier-Parish-School-Bd. Price
Redistricting Voting-rights
R023D.txt 10/12/00 7677 bytes (3 hits)
R023D; 1/24/00. In light of the language of sec.
5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and the
Court's holding in Beer v. United States, 425 U.
S. 130, sec. 5 does not prohibit preclearance of
a redistricting plan enacted with a
discriminatory but nonretrogressive purpose.
Breyer, J., dissenting.
98-405 Reno Bossier-Parish-School-Bd. Price
Redistricting Voting-rights
R023O.txt 10/12/00 48671 bytes (3 hits)
R023O; 1/24/00. In light of the language of sec.
5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and the
Court's holding in Beer v. United States, 425 U.
S. 130, sec. 5 does not prohibit preclearance of
a redistricting plan enacted with a
discriminatory but nonretrogressive purpose.
Opinion
98-405 Reno Bossier-Parish-School-Bd. Price
Redistricting Voting-rights
00a145za.txt 09/11/00 2765 bytes (87 hits)
Amendment to Order 00-A145 UNITED STATES v.
OAKLAND CANNABIS BUYERS' COOPERATIVE
R013.txt 09/11/00 4411 bytes (13 hits)
R013; 1/11/00. Defense counsel's agreement to a
trial date outside the time period set by the
Interstate Agreement on Detainers bars the
defendant from seeking dismissal because trial
did not occur within that period. Syllabus.
98-1299 New-York Hill Scalia,J. IAD Limitations
Detainer
R013O.txt 09/11/00 19713 bytes (5 hits)
R013-O; 1/11/00. Defense counsel's agreement to a
trial date outside the time period set by the
Interstate Agreement on Detainers bars the
defendant from seeking dismissal because trial
did not occur within that period. Scalia, J.,
opinion.
98-1299 Opinion New-York Hill Scalia,J. IAD
Limitations Detainer
R015.txt 09/11/00 5916 bytes (15 hits)
R015; 1/12/00. In enacting the Driver's Privacy
Protection Act of 1994, which restricts the
dissemination and sale of information contained
in state motor vehicle records, Congress did not
run afoul of the federalism principles enunciated
in New York v. United States, 505 U. S. 144, and
Printz v. United States, 521 U. S. 898.
Syllabus.
98-1464 Syllabus Reno Condon 18USC2721-2725
Rehnquist,C.J. Federalism DPPA
R015O.txt 09/11/00 21355 bytes (9 hits)
R015-O; 1/12/00. In enacting the Driver's
Privacy Protection Act of 1994, which restricts
the dissemination and sale of information
contained in state motor vehicle records,
Congress did not run afoul of the federalism
principles enunciated in New York v. United
States, 505 U. S. 144, and Printz v. United
States, 521 U. S. 898. Rehnquist, C. J., opinion
98-1464 Reno Condon
18USC2721-2725 Rehnquist,C.J. Federalism DPPA
84origze.txt 06/29/00 392602 bytes (49 hits)
Decree
981648zc.txt 06/28/00 76361 bytes (129 hits)
MITCHELL ET AL. v. HELMS ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-1648.
Argued December 1, 1999
Decided June 28, 2000
Concurrence
981648zd.txt 06/28/00 124068 bytes (33 hits)
MITCHELL ET AL. v. HELMS ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-1648.
Argued December 1, 1999
Decided June 28, 2000
Dissent
981648zo.txt 06/28/00 96769 bytes (38 hits)
MITCHELL ET AL. v. HELMS ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-1648.
Argued December 1, 1999
Decided June 28, 2000
Opinion
981648zs.txt 06/28/00 25455 bytes (38 hits)
MITCHELL ET AL. v. HELMS ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-1648.
Argued December 1, 1999
Decided June 28, 2000
Syllabus
981856d1.txt 06/28/00 64401 bytes (39 hits)
HILL ET AL. v. COLORADO ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO
No. 98-1856.
Argued January 19, 2000
Decided June 28, 2000
Another Dissent
981856zc.txt 06/28/00 15123 bytes (24 hits)
HILL ET AL. v. COLORADO ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO
No. 98-1856.
Argued January 19, 2000
Decided June 28, 2000
Concurrence
981856zd.txt 06/28/00 62854 bytes (14 hits)
HILL ET AL. v. COLORADO ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO
No. 98-1856.
Argued January 19, 2000
Decided June 28, 2000
Dissent
981856zo.txt 06/28/00 75073 bytes (26 hits)
HILL ET AL. v. COLORADO ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO
No. 98-1856.
Argued January 19, 2000
Decided June 28, 2000
Opinion
981856zs.txt 06/28/00 10801 bytes (22 hits)
HILL ET AL. v. COLORADO ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO
No. 98-1856.
Argued January 19, 2000
Decided June 28, 2000
Syllabus
99-699d1.txt 06/28/00 5145 bytes (144 hits)
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ET AL. v. DALE
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY
No. 99-699.
Argued April 26, 2000
Decided June 28, 2000
Another Dissent
99-699zd.txt 06/28/00 96482 bytes (115 hits)
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ET AL. v. DALE
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY
No. 99-699.
Argued April 26, 2000
Decided June 28, 2000
Dissent
99-699zo.txt 06/28/00 46255 bytes (185 hits)
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ET AL. v. DALE
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY
No. 99-699.
Argued April 26, 2000
Decided June 28, 2000
Opinion
99-699zs.txt 06/28/00 9100 bytes (75 hits)
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ET AL. v. DALE
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY
No. 99-699.
Argued April 26, 2000
Decided June 28, 2000
Syllabus
99-830zc.txt 06/28/00 2724 bytes (81 hits)
STENBERG, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEBRASKA,
ET AL. v. CARHART
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-830.
Argued April 25, 2000
Decided June 28, 2000
Concurrence
99-830zd.txt 06/28/00 1523 bytes (60 hits)
STENBERG, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEBRASKA,
ET AL. v. CARHART
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-830.
Argued April 25, 2000
Decided June 28, 2000
Dissent
99-830zo.txt 06/28/00 61927 bytes (57 hits)
STENBERG, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEBRASKA,
ET AL. v. CARHART
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-830.
Argued April 25, 2000
Decided June 28, 2000
Opinion
99-830zs.txt 06/28/00 17893 bytes (32 hits)
STENBERG, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEBRASKA,
ET AL. v. CARHART
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-830.
Argued April 25, 2000
Decided June 28, 2000
Syllabus
99830zc1.txt 06/28/00 11638 bytes (23 hits)
STENBERG, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEBRASKA,
ET AL. v. CARHART
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-830.
Argued April 25, 2000
Decided June 28, 2000
Another Concurrence
99830zc2.txt 06/28/00 3824 bytes (20 hits)
STENBERG, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEBRASKA,
ET AL. v. CARHART
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-830.
Argued April 25, 2000
Decided June 28, 2000
Still Another Concurrence
99830zd1.txt 06/28/00 10177 bytes (31 hits)
STENBERG, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEBRASKA,
ET AL. v. CARHART
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-830.
Argued April 25, 2000
Decided June 28, 2000
Another Dissent
99830zd2.txt 06/28/00 55871 bytes (25 hits)
STENBERG, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEBRASKA,
ET AL. v. CARHART
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-830.
Argued April 25, 2000
Decided June 28, 2000
Still Another Dissent
99830zd3.txt 06/28/00 108198 bytes (21 hits)
STENBERG, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEBRASKA,
ET AL. v. CARHART
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-830.
Argued April 25, 2000
Decided June 28, 2000
Yet Still Another Dissent
99244zd.txt 06/26/00 37568 bytes (45 hits)
MOBIL OIL EXPLORATION & PRODUCING
SOUTHEAST, INC. v. UNITED STATES
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT
No. 99-244.
Argued March 22, 2000
Decided June 26, 2000*
Dissent
* Together with No. 99-253, Marathon Oil Co. v.
United States, also on certiorari to the same
court.
99244zo.txt 06/26/00 40126 bytes (16 hits)
MOBIL OIL EXPLORATION & PRODUCING
SOUTHEAST, INC. v. UNITED STATES
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT
No. 99-244.
Argued March 22, 2000
Decided June 26, 2000*
Opinion
* Together with No. 99-253, Marathon Oil Co. v.
United States, also on certiorari to the same
court.
99244zs.txt 06/26/00 8916 bytes (10 hits)
MOBIL OIL EXPLORATION & PRODUCING
SOUTHEAST, INC. v. UNITED STATES
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT
No. 99-244.
Argued March 22, 2000
Decided June 26, 2000*
Syllabus
* Together with No. 99-253, Marathon Oil Co. v.
United States, also on certiorari to the same
court.
99401zc.txt 06/26/00 9320 bytes (44 hits)
CALIFORNIA DEMOCRATIC PARTY ET AL. v. JONES,
SECRETARY OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-401.
Argued April 24, 2000
Decided June 26, 2000
Concurrence
99401zd.txt 06/26/00 37209 bytes (20 hits)
CALIFORNIA DEMOCRATIC PARTY ET AL. v. JONES,
SECRETARY OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-401.
Argued April 24, 2000
Decided June 26, 2000
Dissent
99401zo.txt 06/26/00 45226 bytes (32 hits)
CALIFORNIA DEMOCRATIC PARTY ET AL. v. JONES,
SECRETARY OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-401.
Argued April 24, 2000
Decided June 26, 2000
Opinion
99401zs.txt 06/26/00 6824 bytes (14 hits)
CALIFORNIA DEMOCRATIC PARTY ET AL. v. JONES,
SECRETARY OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-401.
Argued April 24, 2000
Decided June 26, 2000
Syllabus
99478zc.txt 06/26/00 4032 bytes (55 hits)
APPRENDI v. NEW JERSEY
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY
No. 99-478.
Argued March 28, 2000
Decided June 26, 2000
Concurrence
99478zd.txt 06/26/00 75441 bytes (27 hits)
APPRENDI v. NEW JERSEY
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY
No. 99-478.
Argued March 28, 2000
Decided June 26, 2000
Dissent
99478zo.txt 06/26/00 78492 bytes (45 hits)
APPRENDI v. NEW JERSEY
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY
No. 99-478.
Argued March 28, 2000
Decided June 26, 2000
Opinion
99478zs.txt 06/26/00 7988 bytes (27 hits)
APPRENDI v. NEW JERSEY
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY
No. 99-478.
Argued March 28, 2000
Decided June 26, 2000
Syllabus
995525zd.txt 06/26/00 55063 bytes (83 hits)
DICKERSON v. UNITED STATES
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-5525.
Argued April 19, 2000
Decided June 26, 2000
Dissent
995525zo.txt 06/26/00 37734 bytes (79 hits)
DICKERSON v. UNITED STATES
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-5525.
Argued April 19, 2000
Decided June 26, 2000
Opinion
995525zs.txt 06/26/00 9777 bytes (34 hits)
DICKERSON v. UNITED STATES
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-5525.
Argued April 19, 2000
Decided June 26, 2000
Syllabus
8origzo.txt 06/19/00 60455 bytes (47 hits)
ARIZONA v. CALIFORNIA
ON EXCEPTIONS TO REPORT OF SPECIAL MASTER
No. 8, Orig.
Argued April 25, 2000
Decided June 19, 2000
Opinion
8origzs.txt 06/19/00 15521 bytes (11 hits)
ARIZONA v. CALIFORNIA
ON EXCEPTIONS TO REPORT OF SPECIAL MASTER
No. 8, Orig.
Argued April 25, 2000
Decided June 19, 2000
Syllabus
8origzx.txt 06/19/00 14293 bytes (11 hits)
ARIZONA v. CALIFORNIA
ON EXCEPTIONS TO REPORT OF SPECIAL MASTER
No. 8, Orig.
Argued April 25, 2000
Decided June 19, 2000
Concurrence/Dissent
99-224zd.txt 06/19/00 21881 bytes (11 hits)
MILLER, SUPERINTENDENT, PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL
FACILITY, ET AL. v. FRENCH ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-224.
Argued April 18, 2000
Decided June 19, 2000*
Dissent
* Together with No. 99-582, United States v.
French et al., also on certiorari to the same
court.
99-224zo.txt 06/19/00 49376 bytes (9 hits)
MILLER, SUPERINTENDENT, PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL
FACILITY, ET AL. v. FRENCH ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-224.
Argued April 18, 2000
Decided June 19, 2000*
Opinion
* Together with No. 99-582, United States v.
French et al., also on certiorari to the same
court.
99-224zs.txt 06/19/00 10505 bytes (10 hits)
MILLER, SUPERINTENDENT, PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL
FACILITY, ET AL. v. FRENCH ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-224.
Argued April 18, 2000
Decided June 19, 2000*
Syllabus
* Together with No. 99-582, United States v.
French et al., also on certiorari to the same
court.
99-224zx.txt 06/19/00 8344 bytes (8 hits)
MILLER, SUPERINTENDENT, PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL
FACILITY, ET AL. v. FRENCH ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-224.
Argued April 18, 2000
Decided June 19, 2000*
Concurrence/Dissent
* Together with No. 99-582, United States v.
French et al., also on certiorari to the same
court.
99-474zc.txt 06/19/00 8513 bytes (16 hits)
CROSBY, SECRETARY OF ADMINISTRATION AND
FINANCE OF MASSACHUSETTS, ET AL. v. NATIONAL
FOREIGN TRADE COUNCIL
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
No. 99-474.
Argued March 22, 2000
Decided June 19, 2000
Concurrence
99-474zo.txt 06/19/00 60184 bytes (14 hits)
CROSBY, SECRETARY OF ADMINISTRATION AND
FINANCE OF MASSACHUSETTS, ET AL. v. NATIONAL
FOREIGN TRADE COUNCIL
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
No. 99-474.
Argued March 22, 2000
Decided June 19, 2000
Opinion
99-474zs.txt 06/19/00 8004 bytes (13 hits)
CROSBY, SECRETARY OF ADMINISTRATION AND
FINANCE OF MASSACHUSETTS, ET AL. v. NATIONAL
FOREIGN TRADE COUNCIL
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
No. 99-474.
Argued March 22, 2000
Decided June 19, 2000
Syllabus
99-62zd.txt 06/19/00 22567 bytes (108 hits)
SANTA FE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT v.
DOE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND FOR
HER MINOR CHILDREN, ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-62.
Argued March 29, 2000
Decided June 19, 2000
Dissent
99-62zo.txt 06/19/00 62072 bytes (79 hits)
SANTA FE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT v.
DOE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND FOR
HER MINOR CHILDREN, ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-62.
Argued March 29, 2000
Decided June 19, 2000
Opinion
99-62zs.txt 06/19/00 10794 bytes (43 hits)
SANTA FE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT v.
DOE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND FOR
HER MINOR CHILDREN, ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-62.
Argued March 29, 2000
Decided June 19, 2000
Syllabus
991625zd.txt 06/19/00 13756 bytes (35 hits)
TANGIPAHOA PARISH BOARD OF EDUCATION ET AL.
v. HERB FREILER ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED
STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-1625.
Decided June 19, 2000
Dissent
981949zo.txt 06/12/00 54962 bytes (99 hits)
PEGRAM ET AL. v. HERDRICH
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-1949.
Argued February 23, 2000
Decided June 12, 2000
Opinion
981949zs.txt 06/12/00 9607 bytes (31 hits)
PEGRAM ET AL. v. HERDRICH
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-1949.
Argued February 23, 2000
Decided June 12, 2000
Syllabus
99-536zc.txt 06/12/00 3264 bytes (72 hits)
REEVES v. SANDERSON PLUMBING PRODUCTS, INC.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-536.
Argued March 21, 2000
Decided June 12, 2000
Concurrence
99-536zo.txt 06/12/00 43256 bytes (81 hits)
REEVES v. SANDERSON PLUMBING PRODUCTS, INC.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-536.
Argued March 21, 2000
Decided June 12, 2000
Opinion
99-536zs.txt 06/12/00 11432 bytes (30 hits)
REEVES v. SANDERSON PLUMBING PRODUCTS, INC.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-536.
Argued March 21, 2000
Decided June 12, 2000
Syllabus
99-579zo.txt 06/12/00 33928 bytes (12 hits)
HARRIS TRUST AND SAVINGS BANK, AS TRUSTEE
FOR THE AMERITECH PENSION TRUST, ET AL. v.
SALOMON SMITH BARNEY INC. ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-579.
Argued April 17, 2000
Decided June 12, 2000
Opinion
99-579zs.txt 06/12/00 10929 bytes (7 hits)
HARRIS TRUST AND SAVINGS BANK, AS TRUSTEE
FOR THE AMERITECH PENSION TRUST, ET AL. v.
SALOMON SMITH BARNEY INC. ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-579.
Argued April 17, 2000
Decided June 12, 2000
Syllabus
995716zd.txt 06/12/00 37150 bytes (21 hits)
CARTER v. UNITED STATES
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
No. 99-5716.
Argued April 19, 2000
Decided June 12, 2000
Dissent
995716zo.txt 06/12/00 42501 bytes (12 hits)
CARTER v. UNITED STATES
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
No. 99-5716.
Argued April 19, 2000
Decided June 12, 2000
Opinion
995716zs.txt 06/12/00 12724 bytes (9 hits)
CARTER v. UNITED STATES
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
No. 99-5716.
Argued April 19, 2000
Decided June 12, 2000
Syllabus
997000zc.txt 06/12/00 8624 bytes (12 hits)
RAMDASS v. ANGELONE, DIRECTOR, VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-7000.
Argued April 18, 2000
Decided June 12, 2000
Concurrence
997000zd.txt 06/12/00 80536 bytes (6 hits)
RAMDASS v. ANGELONE, DIRECTOR, VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-7000.
Argued April 18, 2000
Decided June 12, 2000
Dissent
997000zo.txt 06/12/00 47472 bytes (8 hits)
RAMDASS v. ANGELONE, DIRECTOR, VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-7000.
Argued April 18, 2000
Decided June 12, 2000
Opinion
997000zs.txt 06/12/00 10069 bytes (6 hits)
RAMDASS v. ANGELONE, DIRECTOR, VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-7000.
Argued April 18, 2000
Decided June 12, 2000
Syllabus
981682c1.txt 06/06/00 5012 bytes (59 hits)
UNITED STATES ET AL. v. PLAYBOY ENTERTAINMENT
GROUP, INC.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
No. 98-1682.
Argued November 30, 1999
Decided May 22, 2000
Another Concurrence
981682d1.txt 06/06/00 31071 bytes (13 hits)
UNITED STATES ET AL. v. PLAYBOY ENTERTAINMENT
GROUP, INC.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
No. 98-1682.
Argued November 30, 1999
Decided May 22, 2000
Another Dissent
981682zc.txt 06/06/00 2893 bytes (8 hits)
UNITED STATES ET AL. v. PLAYBOY ENTERTAINMENT
GROUP, INC.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
No. 98-1682.
Argued November 30, 1999
Decided May 22, 2000
Concurrence
981682zd.txt 06/06/00 12923 bytes (13 hits)
UNITED STATES ET AL. v. PLAYBOY ENTERTAINMENT
GROUP, INC.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
No. 98-1682.
Argued November 30, 1999
Decided May 22, 2000
Dissent
981682zo.txt 06/06/00 51780 bytes (23 hits)
UNITED STATES ET AL. v. PLAYBOY ENTERTAINMENT
GROUP, INC.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
No. 98-1682.
Argued November 30, 1999
Decided May 22, 2000
Opinion
981682zs.txt 06/06/00 9890 bytes (12 hits)
UNITED STATES ET AL. v. PLAYBOY ENTERTAINMENT
GROUP, INC.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
No. 98-1682.
Argued November 30, 1999
Decided May 22, 2000
Syllabus
981811zd.txt 06/06/00 70477 bytes (11 hits)
GEIER ET AL. v. AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC.,
ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
No. 98-1811.
Argued December 7, 1999
Decided May 22, 2000
Dissent
981811zo.txt 06/06/00 53959 bytes (8 hits)
GEIER ET AL. v. AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC.,
ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
No. 98-1811.
Argued December 7, 1999
Decided May 22, 2000
Opinion
981811zs.txt 06/06/00 9020 bytes (7 hits)
GEIER ET AL. v. AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC.,
ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
No. 98-1811.
Argued December 7, 1999
Decided May 22, 2000
Syllabus
981828c1.txt 06/06/00 3823 bytes (9 hits)
VERMONT AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES v.
UNITED STATES EX REL. STEVENS
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
No. 98-1828.
Argued November 29, 1999
Decided May 22, 2000
Another Concurrence
981828zc.txt 06/06/00 1064 bytes (4 hits)
VERMONT AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES v.
UNITED STATES EX REL. STEVENS
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
No. 98-1828.
Argued November 29, 1999
Decided May 22, 2000
Concurrence
981828zd.txt 06/06/00 36267 bytes (4 hits)
VERMONT AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES v.
UNITED STATES EX REL. STEVENS
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
No. 98-1828.
Argued November 29, 1999
Decided May 22, 2000
Dissent
981828zo.txt 06/06/00 57049 bytes (12 hits)
VERMONT AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES v.
UNITED STATES EX REL. STEVENS
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
No. 98-1828.
Argued November 29, 1999
Decided May 22, 2000
Opinion
981828zs.txt 06/06/00 6853 bytes (4 hits)
VERMONT AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES v.
UNITED STATES EX REL. STEVENS
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
No. 98-1828.
Argued November 29, 1999
Decided May 22, 2000
Syllabus
989828zd.txt 06/06/00 12273 bytes (8 hits)
OHLER v. UNITED STATES
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-9828.
Argued March 20, 2000
Decided May 22, 2000
Dissent
989828zo.txt 06/06/00 14857 bytes (7 hits)
OHLER v. UNITED STATES
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-9828.
Argued March 20, 2000
Decided May 22, 2000
Opinion
989828zs.txt 06/06/00 4215 bytes (5 hits)
OHLER v. UNITED STATES
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-9828.
Argued March 20, 2000
Decided May 22, 2000
Syllabus
995739c1.txt 06/06/00 1114 bytes (8 hits)
JONES v. UNITED STATES
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-5739.
Argued March 21, 2000
Decided May 22, 2000
Another Concurrence
995739zc.txt 06/06/00 3312 bytes (6 hits)
JONES v. UNITED STATES
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-5739.
Argued March 21, 2000
Decided May 22, 2000
Concurrence
995739zo.txt 06/06/00 24406 bytes (8 hits)
JONES v. UNITED STATES
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-5739.
Argued March 21, 2000
Decided May 22, 2000
Opinion
995739zs.txt 06/06/00 8729 bytes (5 hits)
JONES v. UNITED STATES
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-5739.
Argued March 21, 2000
Decided May 22, 2000
Syllabus
99781zd.txt 06/06/00 17131 bytes (7 hits)
AVIS RENT A CAR SYSTEM, INC., ET AL. v. OSCAR
AGUILAR ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME
COURT OF CALIFORNIA
No. 99-781.
Decided May 22, 2000
Dissent
989537zc.txt 06/05/00 5431 bytes (23 hits)
SIMS v. APFEL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-9537.
Argued March 28, 2000
Decided June 5, 2000
Concurrence
989537zd.txt 06/05/00 11674 bytes (7 hits)
SIMS v. APFEL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-9537.
Argued March 28, 2000
Decided June 5, 2000
Dissent
989537zo.txt 06/05/00 20850 bytes (18 hits)
SIMS v. APFEL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-9537.
Argued March 28, 2000
Decided June 5, 2000
Opinion
989537zs.txt 06/05/00 5421 bytes (10 hits)
SIMS v. APFEL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-9537.
Argued March 28, 2000
Decided June 5, 2000
Syllabus
99-166zc.txt 06/05/00 20007 bytes (22 hits)
UNITED STATES v. HUBBELL
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
No. 99-166.
Argued February 22, 2000
Decided June 5, 2000
Concurrence
99-166zo.txt 06/05/00 50422 bytes (21 hits)
UNITED STATES v. HUBBELL
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
No. 99-166.
Argued February 22, 2000
Decided June 5, 2000
Opinion
99-166zs.txt 06/05/00 8585 bytes (13 hits)
UNITED STATES v. HUBBELL
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
No. 99-166.
Argued February 22, 2000
Decided June 5, 2000
Syllabus
99-658zo.txt 06/05/00 28148 bytes (28 hits)
CASTILLO ET AL. v. UNITED STATES
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-658.
Argued April 24, 2000
Decided June 5, 2000
Opinion
99-658zs.txt 06/05/00 4693 bytes (11 hits)
CASTILLO ET AL. v. UNITED STATES
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-658.
Argued April 24, 2000
Decided June 5, 2000
Syllabus
99138zc.txt 06/05/00 12515 bytes (134 hits)
TROXEL ET VIR. v. GRANVILLE
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON
No. 99-138.
Argued January 12, 2000
Decided June 5, 2000
Concurrence
99138zc1.txt 06/05/00 2739 bytes (48 hits)
TROXEL ET VIR. v. GRANVILLE
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON
No. 99-138.
Argued January 12, 2000
Decided June 5, 2000
Another Concurrence
99138zd.txt 06/05/00 31046 bytes (42 hits)
TROXEL ET VIR. v. GRANVILLE
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON
No. 99-138.
Argued January 12, 2000
Decided June 5, 2000
Dissent
99138zd1.txt 06/05/00 6191 bytes (28 hits)
TROXEL ET VIR. v. GRANVILLE
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON
No. 99-138.
Argued January 12, 2000
Decided June 5, 2000
Another Dissent
99138zd2.txt 06/05/00 21546 bytes (31 hits)
TROXEL ET VIR. v. GRANVILLE
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON
No. 99-138.
Argued January 12, 2000
Decided June 5, 2000
Still Another Dissent
99138zo.txt 06/05/00 38576 bytes (96 hits)
TROXEL ET VIR. v. GRANVILLE
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON
No. 99-138.
Argued January 12, 2000
Decided June 5, 2000
Opinion
99138zs.txt 06/05/00 8228 bytes (54 hits)
TROXEL ET VIR. v. GRANVILLE
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON
No. 99-138.
Argued January 12, 2000
Decided June 5, 2000
Syllabus
99-387zo.txt 05/30/00 22873 bytes (26 hits)
RALEIGH, CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE FOR THE ESTATE OF
STOECKER v. ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-387.
Argued April 17, 2000
Decided May 30, 2000
Opinion
99-387zs.txt 05/30/00 5960 bytes (12 hits)
RALEIGH, CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE FOR THE ESTATE OF
STOECKER v. ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-387.
Argued April 17, 2000
Decided May 30, 2000
Syllabus
99-409zo.txt 05/30/00 28900 bytes (11 hits)
HARTFORD UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE CO. v.
UNION PLANTERS BANK, N. A.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-409.
Argued March 20, 2000
Decided May 30, 2000
Opinion
99-409zs.txt 05/30/00 5350 bytes (10 hits)
HARTFORD UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE CO. v.
UNION PLANTERS BANK, N. A.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-409.
Argued March 20, 2000
Decided May 30, 2000
Syllabus
981991zc.txt 05/15/00 4585 bytes (47 hits)
PUBLIC LANDS COUNCIL ET AL. v. BABBITT,
SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-1991.
Argued March 1, 2000
Decided May 15, 2000
Concurrence
981991zo.txt 05/15/00 45508 bytes (33 hits)
PUBLIC LANDS COUNCIL ET AL. v. BABBITT,
SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-1991.
Argued March 1, 2000
Decided May 15, 2000
Opinion
981991zs.txt 05/15/00 8360 bytes (22 hits)
PUBLIC LANDS COUNCIL ET AL. v. BABBITT,
SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-1991.
Argued March 1, 2000
Decided May 15, 2000
Syllabus
99-116zd.txt 05/15/00 27636 bytes (32 hits)
FISCHER v. UNITED STATES
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-116.
Argued February 22, 2000
Decided May 15, 2000
Dissent
99-116zo.txt 05/15/00 29963 bytes (13 hits)
FISCHER v. UNITED STATES
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-116.
Argued February 22, 2000
Decided May 15, 2000
Opinion
99-116zs.txt 05/15/00 8005 bytes (14 hits)
FISCHER v. UNITED STATES
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-116.
Argued February 22, 2000
Decided May 15, 2000
Syllabus
99-5zc.txt 05/15/00 2218 bytes (46 hits)
UNITED STATES v. MORRISON ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-5.
Argued January 11, 2000
Decided May 15, 2000*
Concurrence
* Together with No. 99-29, Brzonkala v. Morrison
et al., also on certiorari to the same court.
99-5zd.txt 05/15/00 72404 bytes (38 hits)
UNITED STATES v. MORRISON ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-5.
Argued January 11, 2000
Decided May 15, 2000*
Dissent
* Together with No. 99-29, Brzonkala v. Morrison
et al., also on certiorari to the same court.
99-5zd1.txt 05/15/00 28569 bytes (22 hits)
UNITED STATES v. MORRISON ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-5.
Argued January 11, 2000
Decided May 15, 2000*
Another Dissent
* Together with No. 99-29, Brzonkala v. Morrison
et al., also on certiorari to the same court.
99-5zo.txt 05/15/00 67478 bytes (40 hits)
UNITED STATES v. MORRISON ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-5.
Argued January 11, 2000
Decided May 15, 2000*
Opinion
* Together with No. 99-29, Brzonkala v. Morrison
et al., also on certiorari to the same court.
99-5zs.txt 05/15/00 9060 bytes (30 hits)
UNITED STATES v. MORRISON ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-5.
Argued January 11, 2000
Decided May 15, 2000*
Syllabus
* Together with No. 99-29, Brzonkala v. Morrison
et al., also on certiorari to the same court.
995153c1.txt 05/15/00 1511 bytes (13 hits)
JOHNSON v. UNITED STATES
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-5153.
Argued February 22, 2000
Decided May 15, 2000
Another Concurrence
995153zc.txt 05/15/00 4572 bytes (6 hits)
JOHNSON v. UNITED STATES
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-5153.
Argued February 22, 2000
Decided May 15, 2000
Concurrence
995153zd.txt 05/15/00 34357 bytes (6 hits)
JOHNSON v. UNITED STATES
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-5153.
Argued February 22, 2000
Decided May 15, 2000
Dissent
995153zo.txt 05/15/00 46052 bytes (8 hits)
JOHNSON v. UNITED STATES
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-5153.
Argued February 22, 2000
Decided May 15, 2000
Opinion
995153zs.txt 05/15/00 7941 bytes (14 hits)
JOHNSON v. UNITED STATES
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-5153.
Argued February 22, 2000
Decided May 15, 2000
Syllabus
981167c1.txt 05/01/00 8379 bytes (91 hits)
CHRISTENSEN ET AL. v. HARRIS COUNTY ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-1167.
Argued February 23, 2000
Decided May 1, 2000
Another Concurrence
981167d1.txt 05/01/00 4408 bytes (24 hits)
CHRISTENSEN ET AL. v. HARRIS COUNTY ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR
THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-1167.
Argued February 23, 2000
Decided May 1, 2000
Another Dissent
981167zc.txt 05/01/00 1058 bytes (12 hits)
CHRISTENSEN ET AL. v. HARRIS COUNTY ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR
THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-1167.
Argued February 23, 2000
Decided May 1, 2000
Concurrence
981167zd.txt 05/01/00 10363 bytes (14 hits)
CHRISTENSEN ET AL. v. HARRIS COUNTY ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR
THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-1167.
Argued February 23, 2000
Decided May 1, 2000
Dissent
981167zo.txt 05/01/00 27499 bytes (36 hits)
CHRISTENSEN ET AL. v. HARRIS COUNTY ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR
THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-1167.
Argued February 23, 2000
Decided May 1, 2000
Opinion
981167zs.txt 05/01/00 6495 bytes (22 hits)
CHRISTENSEN ET AL. v. HARRIS COUNTY ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR
THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-1167.
Argued February 23, 2000
Decided May 1, 2000
Syllabus
987540zd.txt 05/01/00 59375 bytes (20 hits)
CARMELL v. TEXAS
CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TEXAS,
SECOND DISTRICT
No. 98-7540.
Argued November 30, 1999
Decided May 1, 2000
Dissent
987540zo.txt 05/01/00 102043 bytes (14 hits)
CARMELL v. TEXAS
CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TEXAS,
SECOND DISTRICT
No. 98-7540.
Argued November 30, 1999
Decided May 1, 2000
Opinion
987540zs.txt 05/01/00 9352 bytes (14 hits)
CARMELL v. TEXAS
CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TEXAS,
SECOND DISTRICT
No. 98-7540.
Argued November 30, 1999
Decided May 1, 2000
Syllabus
981480zd.txt 04/26/00 16817 bytes (38 hits)
BECK v. PRUPIS ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-1480.
Argued November 3, 1999
Decided April 26, 2000
Dissent
981480zo.txt 04/26/00 32747 bytes (27 hits)
BECK v. PRUPIS ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-1480.
Argued November 3, 1999
Decided April 26, 2000
Opinion
981480zs.txt 04/26/00 4898 bytes (13 hits)
BECK v. PRUPIS ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-1480.
Argued November 3, 1999
Decided April 26, 2000
Syllabus
986322zc.txt 04/26/00 2557 bytes (17 hits)
SLACK v. MCDANIEL, WARDEN, ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6322.
Argued October 4, 1999
Reargued March 29, 2000
Decided April 26, 2000
Concurrence
986322zo.txt 04/26/00 29845 bytes (14 hits)
SLACK v. MCDANIEL, WARDEN, ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6322.
Argued October 4, 1999
Reargued March 29, 2000
Decided April 26, 2000
Opinion
986322zs.txt 04/26/00 13653 bytes (8 hits)
SLACK v. MCDANIEL, WARDEN, ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6322.
Argued October 4, 1999
Reargued March 29, 2000
Decided April 26, 2000
Syllabus
986322zx.txt 04/26/00 6987 bytes (11 hits)
SLACK v. MCDANIEL, WARDEN, ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6322.
Argued October 4, 1999
Reargued March 29, 2000
Decided April 26, 2000
Concurrence/Dissent
982060zc.txt 04/25/00 12474 bytes (26 hits)
EDWARDS, WARDEN v. CARPENTER
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-2060.
Argued February 28, 2000
Decided April 25, 2000
Concurrence
982060zo.txt 04/25/00 16168 bytes (14 hits)
EDWARDS, WARDEN v. CARPENTER
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-2060.
Argued February 28, 2000
Decided April 25, 2000
Opinion
982060zs.txt 04/25/00 5691 bytes (14 hits)
EDWARDS, WARDEN v. CARPENTER
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-2060.
Argued February 28, 2000
Decided April 25, 2000
Syllabus
99502zo.txt 04/25/00 24073 bytes (22 hits)
NELSON v. ADAMS USA, INC., ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT
No. 99-502.
Argued March 27, 2000
Decided April 25, 2000
Opinion
99502zs.txt 04/25/00 8593 bytes (10 hits)
NELSON v. ADAMS USA, INC., ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT
No. 99-502.
Argued March 27, 2000
Decided April 25, 2000
Syllabus
988384zc.txt 04/18/00 43705 bytes (99 hits)
WILLIAMS v. TAYLOR, WARDEN
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-8384.
Argued October 4, 1999
Decided April 18, 2000
Concurrence
988384zo.txt 04/18/00 86835 bytes (34 hits)
WILLIAMS v. TAYLOR, WARDEN
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-8384.
Argued October 4, 1999
Decided April 18, 2000
Opinion
988384zs.txt 04/18/00 14499 bytes (22 hits)
WILLIAMS v. TAYLOR, WARDEN
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-8384.
Argued October 4, 1999
Decided April 18, 2000
Syllabus
988384zx.txt 04/18/00 8466 bytes (22 hits)
WILLIAMS v. TAYLOR, WARDEN
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-8384.
Argued October 4, 1999
Decided April 18, 2000
Concurrence/Dissent
996615zo.txt 04/18/00 49376 bytes (20 hits)
WILLIAMS v. TAYLOR, WARDEN
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-6615.
Argued February 28, 2000
Decided April 18, 2000
Opinion
996615zs.txt 04/18/00 11818 bytes (21 hits)
WILLIAMS v. TAYLOR, WARDEN
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-6615.
Argued February 28, 2000
Decided April 18, 2000
Syllabus
99312zc.txt 04/17/00 2690 bytes (30 hits)
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO. v. SHANKLIN,
INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF SHANKLIN
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-312.
Argued March 1, 2000
Decided April 17, 2000
Concurrence
99312zd.txt 04/17/00 5154 bytes (21 hits)
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO. v. SHANKLIN,
INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF SHANKLIN
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-312.
Argued March 1, 2000
Decided April 17, 2000
Dissent
99312zo.txt 04/17/00 30976 bytes (31 hits)
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO. v. SHANKLIN,
INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF SHANKLIN
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-312.
Argued March 1, 2000
Decided April 17, 2000
Opinion
99312zs.txt 04/17/00 6560 bytes (28 hits)
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO. v. SHANKLIN,
INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF SHANKLIN
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-312.
Argued March 1, 2000
Decided April 17, 2000
Syllabus
99391zpc.txt 04/04/00 961 bytes (48 hits)
ROBIN FREE, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. ABBOTT
LABORATORIES, INC., ET AL.
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT
OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
[April 3, 2000]
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided
Court.
JUSTICE O’ CONNOR took no part in the
consideration or decision of this case.
981161zc.txt 03/29/00 22726 bytes (57 hits)
CITY OF ERIE ET AL. v. PAP’ S A. M., TDBA
"KANDYLAND"
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
No. 98-1161.
Argued November 10, 1999
Decided March 29, 2000
Concurrence
981161zd.txt 03/29/00 42722 bytes (23 hits)
CITY OF ERIE ET AL. v. PAP’ S A. M., TDBA
"KANDYLAND"
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
No. 98-1161.
Argued November 10, 1999
Decided March 29, 2000
Dissent
981161zo.txt 03/29/00 49782 bytes (20 hits)
CITY OF ERIE ET AL. v. PAP’ S A. M., TDBA
"KANDYLAND"
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
No. 98-1161.
Argued November 10, 1999
Decided March 29, 2000
Opinion
981161zs.txt 03/29/00 17933 bytes (16 hits)
CITY OF ERIE ET AL. v. PAP’ S A. M., TDBA
"KANDYLAND"
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
No. 98-1161.
Argued November 10, 1999
Decided March 29, 2000
Syllabus
981161zx.txt 03/29/00 18906 bytes (17 hits)
CITY OF ERIE ET AL. v. PAP’ S A. M., TDBA
"KANDYLAND"
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
No. 98-1161.
Argued November 10, 1999
Decided March 29, 2000
Concur/Dissent
981993zc.txt 03/28/00 5223 bytes (29 hits)
FLORIDA v. J. L.
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
No. 98 1993.
Argued February 29, 2000
Decided March 28, 2000
Concurrence
981993zo.txt 03/28/00 16605 bytes (19 hits)
FLORIDA v. J. L.
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
No. 98 1993.
Argued February 29, 2000
Decided March 28, 2000
Opinion
981993zs.txt 03/28/00 4628 bytes (14 hits)
FLORIDA v. J. L.
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
No. 98 1993.
Argued February 29, 2000
Decided March 28, 2000
Syllabus
99137zc.txt 03/28/00 6503 bytes (11 hits)
GARNER, FORMER CHAIRMAN OF THE STATE
BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES OF
GEORGIA, ET AL. v. JONES
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-137.
Argued January 11, 2000
Decided March 28, 2000
Concurrence
99137zd.txt 03/28/00 14872 bytes (5 hits)
GARNER, FORMER CHAIRMAN OF THE STATE
BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES OF
GEORGIA, ET AL. v. JONES
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-137.
Argued January 11, 2000
Decided March 28, 2000
Dissent
99137zo.txt 03/28/00 27682 bytes (12 hits)
GARNER, FORMER CHAIRMAN OF THE STATE
BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES OF
GEORGIA, ET AL. v. JONES
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-137.
Argued January 11, 2000
Decided March 28, 2000
Opinion
99137zs.txt 03/28/00 8192 bytes (6 hits)
GARNER, FORMER CHAIRMAN OF THE STATE
BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES OF
GEORGIA, ET AL. v. JONES
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-137.
Argued January 11, 2000
Decided March 28, 2000
Syllabus
99-697zd.txt 03/27/00 13230 bytes (7 hits)
Dissent from Denial of Cert.
981189zc.txt 03/22/00 20754 bytes (20 hits)
BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF
WISCONSIN SYSTEM v. SOUTHWORTH ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-1189. Argued November 9, 1999
Decided March 22, 2000
Concurrence
981189zo.txt 03/22/00 36119 bytes (15 hits)
BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF
WISCONSIN SYSTEM v. SOUTHWORTH ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-1189. Argued November 9, 1999
Decided March 22, 2000
Opinion
981189zs.txt 03/22/00 9030 bytes (12 hits)
BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF
WISCONSIN SYSTEM v. SOUTHWORTH ET AL.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-1189. Argued November 9, 1999
Decided March 22, 2000
Syllabus
99-150zo.txt 03/22/00 22876 bytes (25 hits)
WAL-MART STORES, INC. v. SAMARA BROTHERS,
INC.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
No. 99-150. Argued January 19, 2000
Decided March 22, 2000
Opinion
99-150zs.txt 03/22/00 6319 bytes (19 hits)
WAL-MART STORES, INC. v. SAMARA BROTHERS,
INC.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
No. 99-150. Argued January 19, 2000
Decided March 22, 2000
Syllabus
R021.txt 03/21/00 17067 bytes (8 hits)
R021; 1/19/00. Anders v. California, 386 U. S.
738, sets out one procedure for determining
whether an indigent's direct appeal is frivolous,
but States are free to adopt other procedures so
long as they adequately safeguard a defendant's
Fourteenth Amendment right to appellate counsel;
California's procedure is adequate. Syllabus.
98-1037
R021B.txt 03/21/00 29921 bytes (7 hits)
R021B; 1/19/00. Anders v. California, 386 U. S.
738, sets out one procedure for determining
whether an indigent's direct appeal is frivolous,
but States are free to adopt other procedures so
long as they adequately safeguard a defendant's
Fourteenth Amendment right to appellate counsel;
California's procedure is adequate. Souter, J.,
dissenting.
98-1037
R021O.txt 03/21/00 68399 bytes (5 hits)
R021-O; 1/19/00. Anders v. California, 386 U.
S. 738, sets out one procedure for determining
whether an indigent's direct appeal is frivolous,
but States are free to adopt other procedures so
long as they adequately safeguard a defendant's
Fourteenth Amendment right to appellate counsel;
California's procedure is adequate. Thomas, J.,
opinion.
98-1037
R022.txt 03/21/00 10447 bytes (5 hits)
R022; 1/19/00. A defendant's exercise of
peremptory challenges pursuant to Federal Rule of
Criminal Procedure 24 is not denied or impaired
when the defendant chooses to use such a
challenge to remove a juror who should have been
excused for cause. Syllabus.
98-1255
R022B.txt 03/21/00 3725 bytes (4 hits)
R022B; 1/19/00. A defendant's exercise of
peremptory challenges pursuant to Federal Rule of
Criminal Procedure 24 is not denied or impaired
when the defendant chooses to use such a
challenge to remove a juror who should have been
excused for cause. Scalia, J., concurring in the
judgment.F.R.Cr.P.-24 Jury-selection
R022O.txt 03/21/00 27695 bytes (4 hits)
R022-O; 1/19/00. A defendant's exercise of
peremptory challenges pursuant to Federal Rule of
Criminal Procedure 24 is not denied or impaired
when the defendant chooses to use such a
challenge to remove a juror who should have been
excused for cause. Ginsburg, J., opinion.
F.R.Cr.P.-24 Jury-selection
R036.txt 03/21/00 13225 bytes (24 hits)
FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.
98-1152.ZS. 3/21/00. Reading the Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act as a whole, as well as in
conjunction with Congress' subsequent
tobacco-specific legislation, it is plain that
Congress has not given the Food and Drug
Administration the authority to assert
jurisdiction over tobacco products. Syllabus.
R036A.txt 03/21/00 74727 bytes (8 hits)
FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.
98-1152.ZD. 3/21/00. Breyer, J., dissenting.
R036O.txt 03/21/00 87555 bytes (9 hits)
FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.
98-1152.ZO. 3/21/00. O'Connor, J., opinion.
R037.txt 03/21/00 6573 bytes (7 hits)
Cortez Byrd Chips, Inc. v. Bill Harbert Constr.
Co. 98-1960.ZS. 3/21/00. The venue provisions
of the Federal Arbitration Act are permissive,
allowing a motion to confirm, vacate, or modify
an arbitra-tion award to be brought either in the
district where the award was made or in any
district proper under the general venue statute.
Syllabus.
R037O.txt 03/21/00 24412 bytes (5 hits)
Cortez Byrd Chips, Inc. v. Bill Harbert Constr.
Co. 98-1960.ZO. 3/21/00. Souter, J., opinion.
989183D.txt 03/17/00 11924 bytes (8 hits)
98-9183; Jeffrey Steven Marx, Petitioner, v.
Texas
Decided November 29, 1999. Scalia, J.,
Dissenting.
989741A.txt 03/17/00 11186 bytes (8 hits)
98-9741 and 99-5291; Thomas Knight, AKA Askan
Abdullah Muhammad v. Florida and Carey Dean Moore
v. Nebraska
Decided November 8, 1999. Thomas, J., concurring.
989741D.txt 03/17/00 20136 bytes (7 hits)
98-9741 and 99-5291; Thomas Knight, AKA Askan
Abdullah Muhammad v. Florida and Carey Dean Moore
v. Nebraska
Decided November 8, 1999. Breyer, J., dissenting.
99323D.txt 03/17/00 10073 bytes (7 hits)
99-323; Edward Hanousek, jr. v. United States.
Decided January 10, 2000. Thomas, J., dissenting.
R020.txt 03/15/00 5193 bytes (5 hits)
R020; 1/19/00. The Guam Organic Act does not
require a runoff election when a candidate slate
has received a majority of the votes cast for
Governor and Lieutenant Governor of the
Territory, but not a majority of the number of
ballots cast in the simultaneous general
election. Syllabus.
99-51 Syllabus Gutierrez Ada Souter,J. 48USC1422
Elections Votes
R033.txt 03/10/00 25393 bytes (8 hits)
R033; 3/1/00. This Court is bound by the
controlling statute, 18 U. S. C. sec. 3624(e),
which, by its necessary operation, does not
reduce the length of a supervised release term by
reason of excess time served in prison.
Syllabus.
98-1696 U.S. Johnson 18USC3624(e) Kennedy,J.
Criminal-law Release
R033O.txt 03/10/00 15717 bytes (5 hits)
R033-O; 3/1/00. This Court is bound by the
controlling statute, 18 U. S. C. sec. 3624(e),
which, by its necessary operation, does not
reduce the length of a supervised release term by
reason of excess time served in prison. Kennedy,
J., opinion.
98-1696 U.S. Johnson 18USC3624(e) Kennedy,J.
Criminal-law Release
R034.txt 03/10/00 6703 bytes (5 hits)
R034; 3/6/00. A prosecutor's comments that
respondent had the opportunity to hear all other
witnesses before testifying and tailor his
testimony accordingly did not violate his Fifth
and Sixth Amendment rights to be present at trial
and confront his accusers or his Fourteenth
Amendment right to due process. Syllabus.
98-1170
R034A.txt 03/10/00 2496 bytes (5 hits)
R034A; 3/6/00. A prosecutor's comments that
respondent had the opportunity to hear all other
witnesses before testifying and tailor his
testimony accordingly did not violate his Fifth
and Sixth Amendment rights to be present at trial
and confront his accusers or his Fourteenth
Amendment right to due process. Stevens, J.,
concurring in judgement.
98-1170
R034B.txt 03/10/00 31472 bytes (4 hits)
R034B; 3/6/00. A prosecutor's comments that
respondent had the opportunity to hear all other
witnesses before testifying and tailor his
testimony accordingly did not violate his Fifth
and Sixth Amendment rights to be present at trial
and confront his accusers or his Fourteenth
Amendment right to due process. Ginsburg, J.,
dissenting.R034B; 3/6/00.
98-1170
R034O.txt 03/10/00 35553 bytes (4 hits)
R034-O; 3/6/00. A prosecutor's comments that
respondent had the opportunity to hear all other
witnesses before testifying and tailor his
testimony accordingly did not violate his Fifth
and Sixth Amendment rights to be present at trial
and confront his accusers or his Fourteenth
Amendment right to due process. Scalia, J.,
opinion.
98-1170
R035.txt 03/10/00 12822 bytes (6 hits)
R035; 3/6/00. Washington's supertanker
regulations regarding general navigation watch
procedures, crew English language skills and
training, and maritime casualty reporting are
pre-empted by a comprehensive federal regulatory
scheme; the case is remanded so the validity of
other state regulations may be assessed in light
of the considerable federal interest at stake.
Syllabus.
98-1701 98-1706 Locke U.S.
R035O.txt 03/10/00 62029 bytes (7 hits)
R035-O; 3/6/00. Washington's supertanker
regulations regarding general navigation watch
procedures, crew English language skills and
training, and maritime casualty reporting are
pre-empted by a comprehensive federal regulatory
scheme; the case is remanded so the validity of
other state regulations may be assessed in light
of the considerable federal interest at stake.
Kennedy, J., opinion.
98-1701 98-1706 Locke U.S.
R009.txt 03/08/00 3785 bytes (6 hits)
R009; 11/30/99. This Court certifies to the
Pennsylvania Supreme Court the question whether
the interpretation of Pa. Stat. Ann., Tit. 35,
sec. 6018.401(a), in Scarpone v. Commonwealth,
535 Pa. 273, 279, 634 A. 2d 1109, 1112, was the
correct interpretation of Pennsylvania law at the
date Fiore's conviction under that provision
became final. Syllabus.
98-942 Syllabus Fiore White Breyer,J.
Certified-question Pennsylvania Habeas-corpus
R009O.txt 03/08/00 18319 bytes (6 hits)
R009-O; 11/30/99. This Court certifies to the
Pennsylvania Supreme Court the question whether
the interpretation of Pa. Stat. Ann., Tit. 35,
sec. 6018.401(a), in Scarpone v. Commonwealth,
535 Pa. 273, 279, 634 A. 2d 1109, 1112, was the
correct interpretation of Pennsylvania law at the
date Fiore's conviction under that provision
became final. Breyer, J., opinion.
98-942 Opinion Fiore White Breyer,J.
Certified-question Pennsylvania Habeas-corpus
R012.txt 03/08/00 12536 bytes (8 hits)
R012; 1/11/00. Although the Age Discrimination
in Employment Act of 1967 contains a clear
statement of Congress' intent to abrogate the
States' Eleventh Amendment immunity, that
abrogation exceeded Congress' authority under
sec. 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment. Syllabus.
98-791 O'Connor,J. Kimel Florida-Bd.-of-Regents
ADEA Eleventh-Amdt. Sovereign-immunity
R012A.txt 03/08/00 17939 bytes (5 hits)
R012A; 1/11/00. Although the Age Discrimination
in Employment Act of 1967 contains a clear
statement of Congress' intent to abrogate the
States' Eleventh Amendment immunity, that
abrogation exceeded Congress' authority under
sec. 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment. Stevens, J.,
dissenting in part and concurring in part.
98-791 O'Connor,J. Kimel Florida-Bd.-of-Regents
ADEA Eleventh-Amdt. Sovereign-immunity
R012B.txt 03/08/00 28649 bytes (5 hits)
R012B; 1/11/00. Although the Age Discrimination
in Employment Act of 1967 contains a clear
statement of Congress' intent to abrogate the
States' Eleventh Amendment immunity, that
abrogation exceeded Congress' authority under
sec. 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment. Thomas, J.,
concurring in part and dissenting in part.
98-791 O'Connor,J. Kimel Florida-Bd.-of-Regents
ADEA Eleventh-Amdt. Sovereign-immunity
R012O.txt 03/08/00 68542 bytes (8 hits)
R012-O; 1/11/00. Although the Age Discrimination
in Employment Act of 1967 contains a clear
statement of Congress' intent to abrogate the
States' Eleventh Amendment immunity, that
abrogation exceeded Congress' authority under
sec. 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment. O'Connor,
J., opinion.
98-791 O'Connor,J. Kimel Florida-Bd.-of-Regents
ADEA Eleventh-Amdt. Sovereign-immunity
R017.txt 03/08/00 17236 bytes (8 hits)
R017; 1/12/00. The Fourth Circuit erred in
concluding that a citizen suitor's Clean Water
Act civil penalties claim must be dismissed as
moot when the defendant, after commencement of
the suit, has come into compliance with its
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
permit. Syllabus.
98-822 Friends-of-Earth-Inc. Laidlaw-Environmenta
l 33USC1365 Clean-Water-Act Ginsburg,J. Mootness
R017A.txt 03/08/00 5402 bytes (4 hits)
R017A; 1/12/00. The Fourth Circuit erred in
concluding that a citizen suitor's Clean Water
Act civil penalties claim must be dismissed as
moot when the defendant, after commencement of
the suit, has come into compliance with its
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
permit. Stevens, J., concurring.
98-822 Friends-of-Earth-Inc. Laidlaw-Environmenta
l 33USC1365 Clean-Water-Act Ginsburg,J. Mootness
R017B.txt 03/08/00 1689 bytes (5 hits)
R017B; 1/12/00. The Fourth Circuit erred in
concluding that a citizen suitor's Clean Water
Act civil penalties claim must be dismissed as
moot when the defendant, after commencement of
the suit, has come into compliance with its
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
permit. Kennedy, J., concurring.
98-822 Friends-of-Earth-Inc. Laidlaw-Environmenta
l 33USC1365 Clean-Water-Act Kennedy,J. Mootness
R017C.txt 03/08/00 45252 bytes (4 hits)
R017C; 1/12/00. The Fourth Circuit erred in
concluding that a citizen suitor's Clean Water
Act civil penalties claim must be dismissed as
moot when the defendant, after commencement of
the suit, has come into compliance with its
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
permit. Scalia, J., dissenting.
98-822 Friends-of-Earth-Inc. Laidlaw-Environmenta
l 33USC1365 Clean-Water-Act Scalia,J. Mootness
R017O.txt 03/08/00 56964 bytes (6 hits)
R017-O; 1/12/00. The Fourth Circuit erred in
concluding that a citizen suitor's Clean Water
Act civil penalties claim must be dismissed as
moot when the defendant, after commencement of
the suit, has come into compliance with its
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
permit. Ginsburg, J., opinion.
98-822 Friends-of-Earth-Inc. Laidlaw-Environmenta
l 33USC1365 Clean-Water-Act Mootness
R018.txt 03/08/00 18147 bytes (6 hits)
R018; 1/12/00. The Tenth Circuit erred in
concluding that petitioner's suit challenging the
U. S. Department of Transportation's procedure
for certifying contractors as disadvantaged
business enterprises should be dismissed as moot
after petitioner was so certified by Colorado's
Department of Transportation. Per Curiam.
99-295 PerCuriam Adarand-Constructors Slater
Mootness Burden-of-proof Govt.-contractor
Dept.-of-Transp.
R008.txt 03/02/00 9671 bytes (10 hits)
R008; 11/29/99. Insofar as the Fifth Circuit
held that petitioners were not entitled to
summary judgment on respondent's 42 U. S. C. sec.
1983 claim for damages relating to a state
university's rejection of his admission
application, even if he would have been denied
admission under a race-neutral policy, its
decision contradicts Mt. Healthy City Bd. of Ed.
v. Doyle, 429 U. S. 274. Per Curiam.
PerCuriam 42USC1983 Race-discrim. Texas Lesage
College-admissions Civil-rights Summary-judgment
R011.txt 03/02/00 10050 bytes (6 hits)
R011; 12/7/99. Petitioner's interest as heir to
his mother's estate constituted "property" or a
"righ[t] to property" to which federal tax liens
attached under 26 U. S. C. sec. 6321, despite
petitioner's exercise of the prerogative state
law accorded him to disclaim the interest
retroactively. Syllabus.
98-1101 Drye United-States 26USC6321
Federal-taxes Disclaimer
R011O.txt 03/02/00 27137 bytes (4 hits)
R011-O; 12/7/99. Petitioner's interest as heir to
his mother's estate constituted "property" or a
"righ[t] to property" to which federal tax liens
attached under 26 U. S. C. sec. 6321, despite
petitioner's exercise of the prerogative state
law accorded him to disclaim the interest
retroactively. Ginsburg, J., opinion.
98-1101 Drye United-States 26USC6321
Federal-taxes Disclaimer
R014.txt 03/02/00 5650 bytes (13 hits)
R014; 1/12/00. Police officers did not violate
the Fourth Amendment when they stopped and
searched respondent, who fled an area known for
heavy narcotics trafficking upon seeing a police
caravan. Syllabus.
98-1036 Illinois Wardlow Rehnquist,C.J.
Stop-and-frisk Fourth-Amdt. Terry-stop
R014A.txt 03/02/00 39109 bytes (11 hits)
R014A; 1/12/00. Police officers did not violate
the Fourth Amendment when they stopped and
searched respondent, who fled an area known for
heavy narcotics trafficking upon seeing a police
caravan. Stevens, J., concurring in part and
dissenting in part.
98-1036 Illinois Wardlow Stop-and-frisk
Fourth-Amdt. Terry-stop
R014O.txt 03/02/00 13472 bytes (7 hits)
R014-O; 1/12/00. Police officers did not violate
the Fourth Amendment when they stopped and
searched respondent, who fled an area known for
heavy narcotics trafficking upon seeing a police
caravan. Rehnquist, C. J., opinion.
98-1036 Illinois Wardlow Stop-and-frisk
Fourth-Amdt. Terry-stop
R016.txt 03/02/00 6501 bytes (4 hits)
R016; 1/12/00. Neither the holding nor the
reasoning of Faretta v. California, 422 U. S.
806, requires a State to recognize a
constitutional right to self-representation on
direct appeal from a criminal conviction.
Syllabus.
R016A.txt 03/02/00 1337 bytes (4 hits)
R016A; 1/12/00. Neither the holding nor the
reasoning of Faretta v. California, 422 U. S.
806, requires a State to recognize a
constitutional right to self-representation on
direct appeal from a criminal conviction.
Kennedy, J., concurring.
98-7809 Concur Martinez Court-of-Appeal-of-Cal.
Kennedy,J. Faretta Appeals Self-representation
R016B.txt 03/02/00 1966 bytes (7 hits)
R016B; 1/12/00. Neither the holding nor the
reasoning of Faretta v. California, 422 U. S.
806, requires a State to recognize a
constitutional right to self-representation on
direct appeal from a criminal conviction.
Breyer, J., concurring.
98-7809 Concur Martinez Court-of-Appeal-of-Cal.
Breyer,J. Faretta Appeals Self-representation
R016C.txt 03/02/00 3499 bytes (4 hits)
R016C; 1/12/00. Neither the holding nor the
reasoning of Faretta v. California, 422 U. S.
806, requires a State to recognize a
constitutional right to self-representation on
direct appeal from a criminal conviction.
Scalia, J., concurring in the judgment.
98-7809 Concur Martinez Court-of-Appeal-of-Cal.
Scalia,J. Faretta Appeals Self-representation
R016O.txt 03/02/00 28923 bytes (4 hits)
R016-O; 1/12/00. Neither the holding nor the
reasoning of Faretta v. California, 422 U. S.
806, requires a State to recognize a
constitutional right to self-representation on
direct appeal from a criminal conviction.
Stevens, J., opinion.
98-7809 Opinion Martinez Court-of-Appeal-of-Cal.
Stevens,J. Faretta Appeals Self-representation
R024.txt 03/02/00 12814 bytes (5 hits)
R024; 1/24/00. Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U. S. 1
(per curiam) is authority for state limits on
contributions to state political candidates, and
those limits need not be pegged to the federal
limits approved in Buckley. Syllabus.
98-963 Nixon Shrink-Mo.-Govt.-PAC Elections
Buckley First-Amdt.
R024A.txt 03/02/00 4586 bytes (4 hits)
R024A; 1/24/00. Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U. S. 1
(per curiam) is authority for state limits on
contributions to state political candidates, and
those limits need not be pegged to the federal
limits approved in Buckley. Stevens, J.,
concurring.
98-963 Nixon Shrink-Mo.-Govt.-PAC Elections
Buckley First-Amdt.
R024B.txt 03/02/00 15313 bytes (5 hits)
R024B; 1/24/00. Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U. S. 1
(per curiam) is authority for state limits on
contributions to state political candidates, and
those limits need not be pegged to the federal
limits approved in Buckley. Breyer, J.,
concurring.
98-963 Nixon Shrink-Mo.-Govt.-PAC Elections
Buckley First-Amdt.
R024C.txt 03/02/00 11650 bytes (6 hits)
R024C; 1/24/00. Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U. S. 1
(per curiam) is authority for state limits on
contributions to state political candidates, and
those limits need not be pegged to the federal
limits approved in Buckley. Kennedy, J.,
dissenting.
98-963 Nixon Shrink-Mo.-Govt.-PAC Elections
Buckley First-Amdt.
R024D.txt 03/02/00 55731 bytes (5 hits)
R024D; 1/24/00. Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U. S. 1
(per curiam) is authority for state limits on
contributions to state political candidates, and
those limits need not be pegged to the federal
limits approved in Buckley. Thomas, J.,
dissenting.
98-963 Nixon Shrink-Mo.-Govt.-PAC Elections
Buckley First-Amdt.
R024O.txt 03/02/00 42879 bytes (4 hits)
R024-O; 1/24/00. Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U. S. 1
(per curiam) is authority for state limits on
contributions to state political candidates, and
those limits need not be pegged to the federal
limits approved in Buckley. Souter, J., opinion.
98-963 Nixon Shrink-Mo.-Govt.-PAC Elections
Buckley First-Amdt.
R025.txt 03/02/00 4705 bytes (6 hits)
R025; 2/22/00. Remittances of estimated income
tax and withholding tax are "paid" on the due
date of a calendar year taxpayer's income tax
return. Syllabus
98-1667 Baral U.S. Income-taxes 26USC6511
R025O.txt 03/02/00 19461 bytes (5 hits)
R025-O; 2/22/00. Remittances of estimated income
tax and withholding tax are "paid" on the due
date of a calendar year taxpayer's income tax
return. Opinion.
98-1667 Baral U.S. Income-taxes 26USC6511
R026.txt 03/02/00 9960 bytes (8 hits)
R026; 2/22/00. Fed. Rule Civ. Proc. 50 permits
an appellate court to direct the entry of
judgment as a matter of law when it determines
that evidence was erroneously admitted at trial
and that the remaining, properly admitted,
evidence is insufficient to constitute a
submissible case. Syllabus.
99-161 Weisgram Marley-Co. Appeals F.R.Civ.P.50
Directed-judgment
R026O.txt 03/02/00 39325 bytes (7 hits)
R026-O; 2/22/00. Fed. Rule Civ. Proc. 50 permits
an appellate court to direct the entry of
judgment as a matter of law when it determines
that evidence was erroneously admitted at trial
and that the remaining, properly admitted,
evidence is insufficient to constitute a
submissible case. Opinion.
99-161 Weisgram Marley-Co. Appeals F.R.Civ.P.50
Directed-judgment
R027.txt 03/02/00 6190 bytes (6 hits)
R027; 2/22/00. Because California's interest
deduction offset provision is not a reasonable
allocation of expense deductions to the income
that the expense generates, it constitutes
impermissible taxation of income outside the
State's jurisdictional reach in violation of the
Federal Constitution's Due Process and Commerce
Clauses. Syllabus.
98-2043 Hunt-Wesson-Inc Commerce-Clause
State-taxes Due-Process-Clause
R027O.txt 03/02/00 22199 bytes (6 hits)
R027-O; 2/22/00. Because California's interest
deduction offset provision is not a reasonable
allocation of expense deductions to the income
that the expense generates, it constitutes
impermissible taxation of income outside the
State's jurisdictional reach in violation of the
Federal Constitution's Due Process and Commerce
Clauses. Opinion.
98-2043 Hunt-Wesson-Inc Commerce-Clause
State-taxes Due-Process-Clause
R028.txt 03/02/00 9973 bytes (4 hits)
R028; 2/23/00. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.
S. 668, provides the proper framework for
evaluating a claim that counsel was
constitutionally ineffective for failing to file
a notice of appeal: counsel's representation must
fall below an objective standard of
reasonableness and must have prejudiced the
defendant. Syllabus.
98-1441 Roe Flores-Ortega Right-to-counsel
Notice-of-appeal Sixth-Amdt.
R028A.txt 03/02/00 1379 bytes (4 hits)
R028A; 2/23/00. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.
S. 668, provides the proper framework for
evaluating a claim that counsel was
constitutionally ineffective for failing to file
a notice of appeal: counsel's representation must
fall below an objective standard of
reasonableness and must have prejudiced the
defendant. Breyer, J., concurring.
98-1441 Roe Flores-Ortega Right-to-counsel
Notice-of-appeal Sixth-Amdt.
R028B.txt 03/02/00 14486 bytes (4 hits)
R028B; 2/23/00. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.
S. 668, provides the proper framework for
evaluating a claim that counsel was
constitutionally ineffective for failing to file
a notice of appeal: counsel's representation must
fall below an objective standard of
reasonableness and must have prejudiced the
defendant. Souter, J., concurring in part and
dissenting in part.
98-1441 Roe Flores-Ortega Right-to-counsel
Notice-of-appeal Sixth-Amdt.
R028C.txt 03/02/00 1470 bytes (7 hits)
R028C; 2/23/00. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.
S. 668, provides the proper framework for
evaluating a claim that counsel was
constitutionally ineffective for failing to file
a notice of appeal: counsel's representation must
fall below an objective standard of
reasonableness and must have prejudiced the
defendant. Ginsburg, J., concurring in part and
dissenting in part.
98-1441 Roe Flores-Ortega Right-to-counsel
Notice-of-appeal Sixth-Amdt.
R028O.txt 03/02/00 36651 bytes (4 hits)
R028-O; 2/23/00. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.
S. 668, provides the proper framework for
evaluating a claim that counsel was
constitutionally ineffective for failing to file
a notice of appeal: counsel's representation must
fall below an objective standard of
reasonableness and must have prejudiced the
defendant. O'Connor, J., opinion.
98-1441 Roe Flores-Ortega Right-to-counsel
Notice-of-appeal Sixth-Amdt.
R029.txt 03/02/00 9757 bytes (11 hits)
R029; 2/23/00. The Fifteenth Amendment
invalidates a Hawaii electoral qualification that
permits only "Hawaiians"-descendants of persons
inhabiting Hawaii in 1778-to vote for trustees of
a state agency that administers programs
benefiting "native Hawaiians" and "Hawaiians."
Syllabus.
98-818 Rice Cayetano Hawaii Fifteenth-Amdt.
Right-to-vote
R029A.txt 03/02/00 8444 bytes (5 hits)
R029A; 2/23/00. The Fifteenth Amendment
invalidates a Hawaii electoral qualification that
permits only "Hawaiians"-descendants of persons
inhabiting Hawaii in 1778-to vote for trustees of
a state agency that administers programs
benefiting "native Hawaiians" and "Hawaiians."
Breyer, J., concurring in the result.
98-818 Rice Cayetano Hawaii Fifteenth-Amdt.
Right-to-vote
R029B.txt 03/02/00 53339 bytes (6 hits)
R029B; 2/23/00. The Fifteenth Amendment
invalidates a Hawaii electoral qualification that
permits only "Hawaiians"-descendants of persons
inhabiting Hawaii in 1778-to vote for trustees of
a state agency that administers programs
benefiting "native Hawaiians" and "Hawaiians."
Stevens, J., dissenting.
98-818 Rice Cayetano Hawaii Fifteenth-Amdt.
Right-to-vote
R029C.txt 03/02/00 2136 bytes (6 hits)
R029C; 2/23/00. The Fifteenth Amendment
invalidates a Hawaii electoral qualification that
permits only "Hawaiians"-descendants of persons
inhabiting Hawaii in 1778-to vote for trustees of
a state agency that administers programs
benefiting "native Hawaiians" and "Hawaiians."
Ginsburg, J., dissenting.
98-818 Rice Cayetano Hawaii Fifteenth-Amdt.
Right-to-vote
R029O.txt 03/02/00 59392 bytes (7 hits)
R029-O; 2/23/00. The Fifteenth Amendment
invalidates a Hawaii electoral qualification that
permits only "Hawaiians"-descendants of persons
inhabiting Hawaii in 1778-to vote for trustees of
a state agency that administers programs
benefiting "native Hawaiians" and "Hawaiians."
Kennedy, J., opinion.
98-818 Rice Cayetano Hawaii Fifteenth-Amdt.
Right-to-vote
R030.txt 03/02/00 7156 bytes (7 hits)
R030; 2/23/00. The 4-year limitations period for
a civil RICO claim is not governed by an injury
and pattern discovery rule that starts only when
the claimant discovers, or should discover, both
an injury and pattern of RICO activity.
Syllabus.
R030O.txt 03/02/00 26071 bytes (6 hits)
R030-O; 2/23/00. The 4-year limitations period
for a civil RICO claim is not governed by an
injury and pattern discovery rule that starts
only when the claimant discovers, or should
discover, both an injury and pattern of RICO
activity. Souter, J., opinion.
98-896 Opinion Rotella Wood RICO Limitations
R031.txt 03/02/00 5806 bytes (10 hits)
R031; 2/23/00. The Equal Protection Clause gives
rise to a cause of action on behalf of a "class
of one," where a plaintiff alleges that she has
been intentionally treated differently from
others similarly situated and that there is no
rational basis for such treatment. Per Curiam.
98-1288 PerCuriam Willowbrook-Village Olech
Equal-protection Fourteenth-Amdt. Class-of-one
R031A.txt 03/02/00 2909 bytes (9 hits)
R031A; 2/23/00. The Equal Protection Clause
gives rise to a cause of action on behalf of a
"class of one," where a plaintiff alleges that
she has been intentionally treated differently
from others similarly situated and that there is
no rational basis for such treatment. Breyer,
J., concurring in the result.
98-1288 Willowbrook-Village Olech
Equal-protection Fourteenth-Amdt. Class-of-one
R032.txt 03/02/00 12439 bytes (4 hits)
R032; 2/29/00. Title 42 U. S. C. 405(h), part of
a special system of administrative and judicial
review for denials of Medicare claims, bars
respondent nursing home association from invoking
federal-question jurisdiction to challenge the
validity of Medicare enforcement regulations.
Syllabus.
98-1109 Shalala Illinois-Long-Term-Care
Jurisdiction Medicare Nursing-homes
R032A.txt 03/02/00 4053 bytes (4 hits)
R032A; 2/29/00. Title 42 U. S. C. 405(h), part
of a special system of administrative and
judicial review for denials of Medicare claims,
bars respondent nursing home association from
invoking federal-question jurisdiction to
challenge the validity of Medicare enforcement
regulations. Stevens, J., dissenting.
98-1109 Shalala Illinois-Long-Term-Care
Jurisdiction Medicare Nursing-homes
R032B.txt 03/02/00 3146 bytes (4 hits)
R032B; 2/29/00. Title 42 U. S. C. 405(h), part
of a special system of administrative and
judicial review for denials of Medicare claims,
bars respondent nursing home association from
invoking federal-question jurisdiction to
challenge the validity of Medicare enforcement
regulations. Scalia, J., dissenting.
98-1109 Shalala Illinois-Long-Term-Care
Jurisdiction Medicare Nursing-homes
R032C.txt 03/02/00 52820 bytes (6 hits)
R032C; 2/29/00. Title 42 U. S. C. 405(h), part
of a special system of administrative and
judicial review for denials of Medicare claims,
bars respondent nursing home association from
invoking federal-question jurisdiction to
challenge the validity of Medicare enforcement
regulations. Thomas, J., dissenting.
98-1109 Shalala Illinois-Long-Term-Care
Jurisdiction Medicare Nursing-homes
R032O.txt 03/02/00 62947 bytes (6 hits)
R032-O; 2/29/00. Title 42 U. S. C. 405(h), part
of a special system of administrative and
judicial review for denials of Medicare claims,
bars respondent nursing home association from
invoking federal-question jurisdiction to
challenge the validity of Medicare enforcement
regulations. Breyer, J., opinion.
98-1109 Shalala Illinois-Long-Term-Care
Jurisdiction Medicare Nursing-homes
9995za.txt 11/15/99 1918 bytes (62 hits)
Excel Communications, Inc., et al. v. AT&T Corp.
On petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United
States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
No. 99-95. Decided October 12, 1999.
The petition for writ of certiorari is denied.
R001.txt 11/15/99 2992 bytes (26 hits)
R001; 10/12/99. Abusive filer is denied leave to
proceed in forma pauperis on all future
certiorari petitions in noncriminal cases. Per
Curiam.
98-9913 PerCuriam Brancato Gunn Abusive-filings
Frivolous IFP Certiorari
R002.txt 11/15/99 3655 bytes (15 hits)
R002; 10/12/99. Abusive filer is denied leave to
proceed in forma pauperis on all futu