ÿWPCì ûÿ2ÁB ZR¬Á#|dApple LaserWriter IINTAPLASIIN.PRS&d ªH@Ž—<hhhhð›´PX@CourierCourier Boldûÿ2¼XóXK~£›!Tÿÿr5ddd°ÈäŒdþ6X@ÉüKô@þþþþþþþÿþÿÿÿÿÿþÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ’ÿÿs4ddd°ÃåŒdÐ `É“Kô€þþþþþþþÿþÿÿÿÿÿÿþÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿf„f„f„f·’„Q„\„\„\„\K:K:K:K:•p\\\\•p•p•p•pb„fi\\b\zi„f„f„f„Q„Q„Q„Qi„\„\„ÿÿÿÿbbbbbb™p™pK:K:K:K:fmz:z:z:z:z:•p•p•p•p\\·™„Q„Q„QtUtUtUtUzGzGzG•p•p•p•p•FTNEmpty TAG for pre-circ footnotes$,H1HEADER Level 1 (I)&ŠÁà¨ì)ÁØ€I.؃ BQck QuoteSingle spaced indented quote'Ó" Ù ÙÐÐÂXÂÙ ÙÐÐûÿ2~î~lêH2HEADER Level 2 (A)&ïŒÁàˆì)ÁØA.؃ H3HEADER Level 3 (1)&\»ŽÁà™ì)ÁØ‚1.؃ Ô s4 ÔРȧ Ðà à ORDER LIST FRIDAY, JANUARY 21, 1994 Ô s4ê ÔÁàÒì)ÁORDER IN PENDING CASEÄ Äƒ 93©5256 WILLIAMSON, FREDEL V. UNITED STATES In lieu of the first question presented by the petition for a writ of certiorari, the parties are directed to brief and argue, in addition to Questions 2 and 3, the following question: Whether a post©arrest confession by an accomplice implicating a defendant, offered as an admission against penal interest of an unavailable declarant under Federal Rule of Evidence 804(b) (3), bears adequate indicia of reliability to render it admissible under Rule 804(b) (3) and the Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause? Ô s4. Ôà à CERTIORARI GRANTED Ä Ä 92-1920 LIVADAS, KAREN V. AUBRY, LLOYD, ETC. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The brief of petitioner is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Friday, March 4, 1994. The brief of respondent is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Friday, April 1, 1994. A reply brief, if any, is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Friday, April 15, 1994. Rule 29 does not apply. 93-201 ALLEN & CO. INC. V. PACIFIC DUNLOP HOLDINGS The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The brief of petitioner is to be filed with the Clerk ÔË'0*Á(Á(°°ÔŒ and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Friday, March 4, 1994. The brief of respondent is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Friday, April 1, 1994. A reply brief, if any, is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Friday, April 15, 1994. Rule 29 does not apply. 93-880 MADSEN, JUDY, ET AL. V. WOMEN'S HEALTH CENTER, ET AL. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The brief of petitioners is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Friday, March 4, 1994. The brief of respondents is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Friday, April 1, 1994. A reply brief, if any, is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Friday, April 15, 1994. Rule 29 does not apply.