(ORDER LIST: 529 U.S.)

MONDAY, MAY 22, 2000

CERTIORARI -- SUMMARY DISPOSITION

99-1227 ROSQUIST, BRYON, ET AL. V. McCANN, MELANIE, ET AL.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the

United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit for

further consideration in light of United States v.

Morrison, 529 U.S. ____ (2000).

99-1583 PENNSYLVANIA V. D. M.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Eastern District, for

further consideration in light of Illinois v. Wardlow,

528 U.S. ____ (2000).

ORDERS IN PENDING CASES

99M87 ZIMBOVSKY, ASYA D. V. MASSACHUSETTS

The motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition

for a writ of certiorari out-of-time under Rule 14.5 is

denied.

99M88 TILLIS TRUCKING CO., INC. V. MOSES, MALACHI, ET AL.

99M89 BARBOSA, CECILIO, ET AL. V. HOSPITAL ALEJANDRO BUITRAGO

The motions to direct the Clerk to file petitions

for writs of certiorari out-of-time are denied.

99-1295 GITLITZ, D., ET UX., ET AL. V. CIR

The motion of the Solicitor General to dispense

with printing the joint appendix is granted.

99-8264 DELESPINE, CLINTON W. V. JOHNSON, DIR., TX DCJ

The motion of petitioner for reconsideration of

order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis is

denied.

99-9052 SAMUEL, ALEXANDER V. NATHAN'S FAMOUS OPERATING

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in

forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until

June 12, 2000, within which to pay the docketing fee

required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in

compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.

CERTIORARI GRANTED

99-1257 BROWNER, EPA ADMINR. V. AM. TRUCKING ASSNS., ET AL.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.

99-1178 SOLID WASTE AGENCY, ETC. V. U.S. ARMY CORP. ENGINEERS

The motion of Pacific Legal Foundation and Randy

Peterson for leave to file a brief as amici curiae is

granted. The motion of National Association of Home

Builders for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is

granted. The motion of American Farm Bureau Federation

for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.

99-1379 CIRCUIT CITY STORES, INC. V. ADAMS, SAINT CLAIR

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted

limited to Question 1 presented by the petition.

99-6218 ROGERS, WILBERT K. V. TENNESSEE

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in

forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari

are granted.

CERTIORARI DENIED

98-1996 PELCHAT, JOSEPH CHARLES V. UNITED STATES

98-9402 DAVIS, DARWIN K. V. UNITED STATES

98-9601 BEARDEN, THELONIOUS V. UNITED STATES

99-1203 THERIOT, DENNIS, ET AL. V. JEFFERSON PARISH, LA, ET AL.

99-1209 NOVATO FIRE PROTECT. DIST. V. UNITED STATES, ET AL.

99-1283 KUMAR, SURESH V. UNITED STATES

99-1367 ABBOTT, AMILIA, ET AL. V. MEDGAR EVERS HOUSES, ET AL.

99-1370 NEW YORK, ET AL. vs. YONKERS BD. OF ED., ET AL.

99-1439 ANDEREGG, JAMES V. WASHINGTON

99-1526 UNIV. OF CO FOUNDATION, INC. vs. AM. CYANAMID CO.

99-1537 BORDEN, INC., ET AL. V. MORTON'S MARKET, INC., ET AL.

99-1538 TARANTO, SHEILA V. NORTH SLOPE BOROUGH

99-1545 GONZALES, PAUL, ET UX. V. KERRVILLE, TX, ET AL.

99-1546 LAKE CHARLES STEVEDORES, INC V. PROFESSOR VLADIMIR POPOV MV

99-1561 OLIVER, RUBY, ET VIR vs. SAHA, SIBU P., ET AL.

99-1569 DAVID, FRED V. HANOVER INS. CO.

99-1588 STANTON, JOHN vs. DCCA

99-1599 HOPPER, ROBERT, ET AL. V. ROBINSON, ADMR. ATTY. REG.

99-1610 YSLETA DEL SUR PUEBLO V. LANEY, DAVID, ET AL.

99-1617 McMASTER, WILLIAM D. vs. MI NATL. CORP., ET AL.

99-1661 RENNERT, PHILIP ANDRE V. UNITED STATES

99-1670 WEBB, GALE, ET UX. V. MENDENHALL, ANTHONY, ET AL.

99-1703 CHOE, JIM V. UNITED STATES

99-1712 BENAVIDES, AURELIO V. GERVER, KENT A., ET UX.

99-6879 MARLOW, ROBERT T. V. UNITED STATES

99-7908 RODIA, JOSEPH V. UNITED STATES

99-7918 WILLIAMS, GARY A. V. UNITED STATES

99-7958 DEWBERRY, JOHN C. V. TEXAS

99-8016 ABRAM, STACY V. LAXTON, EDWARD, ET AL.

99-8244 ) RICHARDSON, WILLIAM L. V. RICHARDSON, ROSEMARIE

)

99-8245 ) RICHARDSON, WILLIAM L. V. AMERICA ONLINE

)

99-8246 ) RICHARDSON, WILLIAM L. V. SPRINT PCS

)

99-8247 ) RICHARDSON, WILLIAM L. V. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF MD

)

99-8287 ) RICHARDSON, WILLIAM L. V. BELL ATLANTIC CORP.

99-8271 BURTON, MARK A. V. UNITED STATES

99-8639 DUNCAN, TIMOTHY W. V. BARRERAS, WARDEN, ET AL.

99-8641 JACKSON, IVORY J. V. JOHNSON, DIR., TX DCJ

99-8643 McDOWELL, TOMMIE L. V. NEVADA

99-8646 MAHON, JOHNNIE R. V. LOS ANGELES COUNTY, ET AL.

99-8648 JONES, JEFFREY W. V. COMM'R OF LABOR OF NY

99-8664 COFFEE, KING W. V. DOTH, DAVID, ETC.

99-8669 TAYLOR, CARSBIA V. vs. DEES, WARDEN, ET AL.

99-8670 WELCH, VAN P. V. ANGELONE, DIR., VA DOC

99-8671 WALKER, ERIC V. AKERS, JAMES, ET AL.

99-8673 STEMLEY, LOUIS V. FOTI, SHERIFF OF ORLEANS

99-8679 JEFFERS, SAMUEL T. V. CAIN, WARDEN

99-8680 MANTHEI, RAMONA V. BOGAN, WARDEN, ET AL.

99-8686 ALDRIDGE, STEPHEN M. V. ZULPO-DANE, MONET, ET AL.

99-8687 ANGLETON, BRAD C. V. INDIANA

99-8689 CLAY, LOUIS J. V. SANDERS, JUDGE, ETC.

99-8690 AYERS, JAMES A. V. MEMPHIS, TN, ET AL.

99-8693 DOMINGUEZ, RAUL V. KUHLMANN, SUPT., SULLIVAN

99-8698 PRUITT, FRANK V. IRVIN, SUPT., WENDE

99-8709 STEWART, DELORES V. ILLINOIS

99-8719 WILLIAMS, DARREN R. V. JOHNSON, DIR., TX DCJ

99-8722 MUHAMMAD, AKEEM V. FL DOC, ET AL.

99-8723 MORSE, ROBERT A. V. MOORE, SEC., FL DOC, ET AL.

99-8726 RICHARDSON, WILLIAM L. V. BROAD LANE, INC., ET AL.

99-8728 BAPTIST, VICTOR V. ILLINOIS

99-8729 KINCHLOE,PAUL A. V. MICHIGAN, ET AL.

99-8730 LASSAN, ALICE R. V. GULF SHORES, AL

99-8731 LEE, FRANK V. ALABAMA

99-8735 CITTADINO, CALVIN V. CAIN, WARDEN

99-8736 BUTLER, JOHNNY L. V. PITZER, WARDEN, ET AL.

99-8738 ALFORD, RICKEY L. vs. USDC ED PA

99-8739 DUKE, LYNNETTE M. V. ABSENTEE SHAWNEE TRIBE

99-8744 HAIRSTON, JAMES H. V. IDAHO

99-8756 PENNS, ESTHER V. LOUISIANA

99-8760 McLEAN, QUENTIN V. MEMBERS OF VA BD. OF CORREC.

99-8761 MARSH, FIONA E. V. VIRGINIA

99-8762 MURDOCK, ROBERT V. WASHINGTON, ODIE, ET AL.

99-8763 ATKINS, AARON C. V. TESSMER, WARDEN

99-8764 CORONADO, ROLANDO V. WALKER, SUPT., AUBURN

99-8773 HILL, EDWARD A. V. BRIGANO, WARDEN

99-8784 COUTEE, JOHN J. V. DORMIRE, SUPT., ET AL.

99-8834 KIKUYAMA, DEREK M. V. MADDOCK, WARDEN, ET AL.

99-8845 CHAPPELL, RAYMOND F. V. DEEDS, WARDEN

99-8857 FARMER, PAUL V. TRENT, WARDEN, ET AL.

99-8885 SLEDGE, JOSEPH, JR. V. NORTH CAROLINA

99-8960 ATAMIAN, GABRIEL G. V. GORKIN, ROBERT A.

99-9010 GARCIA, ARMANDO J. V. HENRY, IVALEE

99-9012 FLETCHER, JAMES M. vs. NC DEPT. OF REVENUE, ET AL.

99-9046 PAUL, MADHABENDRA P. V. DEPT. OF NAVY

99-9059 SHAYESTEH, AHMAD R. vs. USCA 10TH CIRCUIT

99-9066 MARTIN, DONALD M. V. UNITED STATES

99-9082 McNEIL, RUDOLPH V. CORCORAN, WARDEN, ET AL.

99-9093 PEREZ-DE ANGEL, LORENZO V. UNITED STATES

99-9094 ROMERO-CRUZ, LUIS V. UNITED STATES

99-9106 ANCISO, MARIO V. UNITED STATES

99-9109 BOLLMAN, WAYNE E. V. UNITED STATES

99-9125 NORFLEET, ARMOND DE'AMPIET V. UNITED STATES

99-9129 WALKER, RANDY A. V. UNITED STATES

99-9132 BROCAMONTE, EFREN V. UNITED STATES

99-9137 GRIFFIN, CLAUDE A. V. UNITED STATES

99-9138 HARRIS, RETESHIA V. UNITED STATES

99-9142 FORREST, RICHARD A. V. UNITED STATES

99-9145 GREEN, ALBERT J. V. CONNECTICUT

99-9147 HAKOPIAN, AKOP V. UNITED STATES

99-9148 GEORGE, DON V. UNITED STATES

99-9149 GIOVANNANGELI, GARY J. V. UNITED SATTES

99-9150 GEDMAN, MICHAEL A. V. UNITED STATES

99-9152 GRAHAM, JOHNNY R. V. UNITED STATES

99-9153 DAMERVILLE, MICHAEL R. V. UNITED STATES

99-9155 HOLMES, DANIEL G. V. UNITED STATES

99-9156 ENIGWE, IFEDOO N. V. UNITED STATES

99-9157 FAIRLY, RASHEEN D. V. UNITED STATES

99-9159 DYSON, LARRY V. UNITED STATES

99-9161 RASHID, AMIN A. V. RENO, ATTORNEY GENERAL

99-9163 RODRIGUEZ, GOMEO V. UNITED STATES

99-9167 COX, JAMES R. V. UNITED STATES

99-9169 BETEMIT, ALBERT V. UNITED STATES

99-9173 SANCHEZ, RAUL V. UNITED STATES

99-9184 PATTERSON, WILLIAM K. V. UNITED STATES

99-9189 BUCKLEY, MARK V. vs. UNITED STATES

99-9192 UPSHAW, TERRENCE V. UNITED STATES

99-9197 PENA, ALEXANDER V. UNITED STATES

99-9200 TURNER, EDDIE E. V. UNITED STATES

99-9203 MAJORS, GARETH E. V. UNITED STATES

99-9204 MARINO, VINCENT M. V. UNITED STATES

99-9211 STONE, CHESTER F. V. UNITED STATES

99-9215 CALDERON-ESPINOZA, GREGORIO V. UNITED STATES

99-9219 MANSILLA-HERNANDEZ, F. V. UNITED STATES

99-9226 RODRIGUEZ, RAUL A. V. UNITED STATES

99-9239 JONES, KENNETH V. UNITED STATES

99-9240 LESLIE, RICHARD D. V. UNITED STATES

99-9241 STEVENSON, JOHN V. UNITED STATES

99-9242 GODWIN, ERIC V. UNITED STATES

99-9243 DEHANEY, GRANVILLE I. V. UNITED SATTES

99-9246 GEERS, THOMAS R. V. UNITED STATES

99-9254 FULLER, THOMAS S. V. UNITED STATES

99-9261 COLEMAN, BRIAN P. V. UNITED STATES

99-9262 ALEXANDER, HAYWOOD V. FLOWERS, WARDEN

99-9270 McSWAIN, EMMETT F. V. UNITED STATES

The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied.

99-1277 PHILIP MORRIS INC., ET AL. V. ENGLE, HOWARD, ET AL.

The motion of Chamber of Commerce of the United

States for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is

granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is

denied.

99-1533 M. C. PRODUCTS, ET AL. V. AT&T CORP.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.

Justice O'Connor took no part in the consideration or

decision of this petition.

99-1534 RAY, HOWARD, ET AL. V. IWANSKI, JUDY GAIL, ETC.

The motion of respondent for leave to proceed in

forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of

certiorari is denied.

99-1565 AM. AIRLINES, INC. V. CRUZ, MARIA V., ET AL.

The motion of Air Transport Association of America

for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.

99-8696 BUCHANAN, JASPER V. DOE, JOHN, ETC.

99-8752 GIBSON, JEFFREY V. SUSQUEHANNA TOWNSHIP COMM'RS

The motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in

forma pauperis are denied, and the petitions for writs of

certiorari are dismissed. See Rule 39.8.

HABEAS CORPUS DENIED

99-9267 IN RE PAUL JAMES CAVANAUGH, JR.

The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is denied.

99-9294 IN RE EDDIE LEE GALLOWAY

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in

forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of

habeas corpus is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner

has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is

directed not to accept any further petitions in non-criminal

matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required

by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in

compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of

Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).

Justice Stevens dissents. See id., at 4, and cases cited

therein.

MANDAMUS DENIED

99-8724 IN RE DAVIS KING

99-8751 IN RE JIMMY HARRIS

99-8829 IN RE LARRY ZANE SHORT

The petitions for writs of mandamus are denied.

REHEARINGS DENIED

99-1275 SCHEIDLY, JOSEPH M. V. TRAVELERS INSURANCE CO.

99-1276 GREENE, ROBERT V. DAVID, DOUGLAS, ET AL.

99-1309 CHANDLER, RICHARD L. V. CHANDLER, RACHEL, ET AL.

99-6512 JAMES, VINCENT T. V. HANKS, SUPT., WABASH VALLEY

99-6808 GENCO, JOSEPH V. UNITED STATES, ET AL.

99-6913 GENCO, JOSEPH vs. USDC OR

99-6978 MITCHELL, AMBROSE V. UNITED STATES

99-7177 WARD, PHILLIP A. V. TRENT, WARDEN

99-7178 TSU, JOSEPH N. Y., ET UX. vs. TRACY FEDERAL BANK, ET AL.

99-7322 WATTS, MICHAEL G. V. JOHNSON, DIR., TX DCJ

99-7676 LINDSEY, ROY G. V. CATOE, DIR., SC DOC, ET AL.

99-7825 SOSA, PEDRO S. V. JOHNSON, DIR., TX DCJ

99-7860 KLUMPP, JESSE G. V. LUEBBERS, SUPT., POTOSI

99-7872 LINGAR, STANLEY D. V. LUEBBERS, SUPT., POTOSI

99-7982 TAYLOR, RALPH A. V. CALIFORNIA

99-8013 IFABIYI, SUNDAY K. V. UNITED STATES

99-8029 KIPKIRWA, LAZARUS V. SANTA CLARA COUNTY, CA

99-8048 ARRINGTON, MICHAEL D. V. BROWARD COMMUNITY COLLEGE

99-8072 MENDOZA, J. GREGORY, ET UX. V. PENNINGTON, JOHN, ET AL.

99-8644 MADDEN, TOY B. V. UNITED STATES

The petitions for rehearing are denied.

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE

D-2137 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF THOMAS M. GEREIGHTY

Thomas M. Gereighty, of New Orleans, Louisiana,

having been suspended from the practice of law in this

Court by order of January 18, 2000; and a rule having

been issued requiring him to show cause why he should

not be disbarred;

It is ordered that Thomas M. Gereighty is disbarred

from the practice of law in this Court.

D-2140 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF FRANKLIN KEITH PAYNE MOORE

Franklin Keith Payne Moore, of Puerto Vallarta,

Mexico, having been suspended from the practice of law

in this Court by order of February 22, 2000; and a rule

having been issued requiring him to show cause why he

should not be disbarred;

It is ordered that Franklin Keith Payne Moore is

disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

D-2143 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF NICHOLAS M. SPINA

Nicholas M. Spina, of Melrose Park, Illinois,

having been suspended from the practice of law in this

Court by order of February 22, 2000; and a rule having

been issued requiring him to show cause why he should

not be disbarred;

It is ordered that Nicholas M. Spina is disbarred

from the practice of law in this Court.

D-2146 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF ROGER TEHAN SCULLY

Roger Tehan Scully, of Rockville, Maryland, having

been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by

order of February 22, 2000; and a rule having been

issued requiring him to show cause why he should not be

disbarred;

It is ordered that Roger Tehan Scully is disbarred

from the practice of law in this Court.

D-2147 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF GLENN HERBERT CARLSON

Glenn Herbert Carlson, of Washington, D.C., having

been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by

order of February 22, 2000; and a rule having been

issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause

why he should not be disbarred; and the time to file a

response having expired;

It is ordered that Glenn Herbert Carlson is

disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

D-2151 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF ROBERT L. TRAVIS, JR.

Robert L. Travis, Jr., of Tallahassee, Florida,

having been suspended from the practice of law in this

Court by order of March 27, 2000; and a rule having been

issued and served upon him requiring him to show cause

why he should not be disbarred; and a response having

been filed;

It is ordered that Robert L. Travis, Jr., is

disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

D-2155 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF TEDDY I. MOORE

Teddy I. Moore, of Flushing, New York, having been

suspended from the practice of law in this Court by

order of April 17, 2000; and a rule having been issued

and served upon him requiring him to show cause why he

should not be disbarred; and a response having been

filed;

It is ordered that Teddy I. Moore is disbarred from

the practice of law in this Court. Justice Stevens,

Justice Kennedy, Justice Souter, and Justice Breyer dissent.

D-2160 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JAMES PATRICK TIERNEY

James Patrick Tierney, of Malibu, California, is

suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a

rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring

him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from

the practice of law in this Court.

D-2161 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF LLOYD B. SOKOLOW

Lloyd B. Sokolow, of Schenectady, New York, is

suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a

rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring

him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from

the practice of law in this Court.

D-2162 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF ALTON G. MURCHISON, III

Alton G. Murchison, III, of Charlotte, North

Carolina, is suspended from the practice of law in this

Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days,

requiring him to show cause why he should not be

disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

D-2163 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF SYDNEY FRIEDLER

Sydney Friedler, of Hempstead, New York, is

suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a

rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring

him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from

the practice of law in this Court.

D-2164 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF ROBERT BENT CARLSON

Robert Bent Carlson, of North Port, Florida, is

suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a

rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring

him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from

the practice of law in this Court.

D-2165 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF DAVID FERRIS TAMER

David Ferris Tamer, of Winston-Salem, North

Carolina, is suspended from the practice of law in this

Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days,

requiring him to show cause why he should not be

disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.

RECESS ORDER

The Court will take a recess from Monday, May 22,

2000, until Tuesday, May 30, 2000.